Flyingiguana
New Member
sec is a strong conference, but luck and that offense is pretty strong. it's kinda like having peyton manning running a big ten power running team.
I want Boise State and Chris Peterson to win the glory that is rightfully theirs!!!!!!!! reward the little schools!
Rightfully theirs?
How do you think they would do if they had to play USC, Oregon and Stanford all in the same year?
Or Bama, LSU and Florida all in the same year?
Why?
Some of the reasons given for Rodgers lasting as long as he did in the draft were... It was Tedfords system, weak arm , not athletic enough and there was even a meathead that questioned the level of his competition which is asinine.
Any scout that uses the conference as a determining factor for a QBs worth in the NFL is not that astute IMO.
There is little doubt that the SEC is the top conference in college football today but Andrew Luck would still be the first overall pick in the draft even if he played there.
yeah, "Tedford's system" was a big deal for some? agree which conference should not be a big factor, it DOES factor in but somehwere down the list.
seem to recall one of the reasons Rodgers fell was...........no team above 10 needed a QB? even before the draft, we read that IF Rodgers or Smith fell past #9, they'd free fall? ok, i'm guessing on "#9", but somewhere around that spot.
It shouldn't with the major conferences. Flacco coming from Delaware makes sense to question the level of competition he went against. Questions of Luck in the Pac-12 or Rodgers in the Pac-10 is luaghable. Tedford ran a pro-style offense, which should have been a plus for Rodgers as opposed to the spreads so prevalent in college football today.
yeah, so it does factor in, just not high on the list.
an evalutator will consider the competition he played against? if from a major conference, he won't give it as much weight, maybe hardly at all? if from a low level, he will.
Luck is from a good enough conference so can't agree with where RJF was going.
I want Boise State and Chris Peterson to win the glory that is rightfully theirs!!!!!!!! reward the little schools!
Rightfully theirs?
How do you think they would do if they had to play USC, Oregon and Stanford all in the same year?
Or Bama, LSU and Florida all in the same year?
Boise St. doesn't deserve to be anywhere near the NCG.
It's a pretty well held opinion that outside of the SEC defenses are far more suspect. Facing SEC defenses week after week will test the best QB's.
It shouldn't with the major conferences. Flacco coming from Delaware makes sense to question the level of competition he went against. Questions of Luck in the Pac-12 or Rodgers in the Pac-10 is luaghable. Tedford ran a pro-style offense, which should have been a plus for Rodgers as opposed to the spreads so prevalent in college football today.
It's a pretty well held opinion that outside of the SEC defenses are far more suspect. Facing SEC defenses week after week will test the best QB's.
Except that SEC QB's are essentially garbage in the NFL. Minus the Mannings. I guess Stafford has a chance if he can figure out how to stay healthy.
3-0 in the first scenario, if all three were road games.
2-1 in the second scenario if they had to play in Louisiana. Possibly 2-1 if LSU travels to Idaho, but it would be a barn burner that probably came down to the last play.
You're kidding if you think USC, Florida, Oregon and Stanford are in the same class as Boise State. It's not even close.