mr.hockey4242
Well-Known Member
Why is hitting an adult assault, but hitting a defenseless child not?
He said punching a worker in the face. If you can't see difference to spanking a child then idk what to say
Why is hitting an adult assault, but hitting a defenseless child not?
If one of my adult employees acts up and I take him or her over my knee and give a spanking, I'm going to jail and getting fired. Rightfully so. I don't understand why it's ok if it's a child.
Why is hitting an adult assault, but hitting a defenseless child not?
If one of my adult employees acts up and I take him or her over my knee and give a spanking, I'm going to jail and getting fired. Rightfully so. I don't understand why it's ok if it's a child.
By that logic, if my employee doesn't respond to verbal coaching, can I punch him in the face?
I'm aware of what a spanking is and don't understand why anyone would think it's ok. Lashing them with a belt is even worse.
It wasn't merely a spanking...
a "switch" was allegedly used in the child's beating.
Why is hitting an adult assault, but hitting a defenseless child not?
Spankings were very common when I was growing up.Because ever since mankind can remember corporal punishment has been an accepted form of punishment for dealing with children. The notion of never touching a child is relatively new. When I graduated high school teachers still kept the strap in their desks for "bad" kids. That was 1986. I don't think the millions of kids who grew up in my generation or the ones before are somehow destroyed mentally because they received some spankings.
While that may be true, nobody here is forgiving or defending abuse or over-disciplining. Causing injury or bleeding is over the line, but something like a spanking for mouthing off is teaching your kid how to not be a dipshit and will help them in life.The endless cycle just perpetuates. Chances are when kids are (abused) or overly disciplined physically and mentally.....they grow up to do the same thing to their kids...and the research numbers on this corroborates.
There's a difference between abuse and hitting your kids with a belt or switch.
How is that the disturbing part? It would be pretty common for the kid to reach back and cover his butt as he's about to get spanked/hit which would leave the marks on his hands.I'm late to the party. Lots of facts still need to come out but from one report I read (I'll try and link it), the mother brought the son to a doctor in MN when he returned from visiting Adrian in Houston. Upon the visit, they discovered bruises and cuts on the boys legs and buttocks. The disturbing part is that they also found lacerations on the boys hands. That's basically what got this ball rolling.
Obviously, child abuse is a horrible, horrible thing. I'm not saying this is or isn't child abuse because no one in the general public has enough information as of now but this timing couldn't really be any worse. This is just a sad situation all around.
Got spanked in school on a regular basis as well. Nothing wrong with it, and I always took it by choice. You would have options: 3 licks or doing sentences, sometimes the option of being suspended.
3 licks every single time. Get that crap over with, ain't nobody got time to spend hours writing sentences.
Didn't even have to think about.
Not really. Spank your kids with your hand. No need to go off and use something to fuck them up more.
Most current kids would now I imagine but the teachers can't even TOUCH the kids so that won't work anymore....old school stuff.Got spanked in school on a regular basis as well. Nothing wrong with it, and I always took it by choice. You would have options: 3 licks or doing sentences, sometimes the option of being suspended.
3 licks every single time. Get that crap over with, ain't nobody got time to spend hours writing sentences.
Didn't even have to think about.