"A one loss PAC 12 champ will make the playoffs"

[hailtoyourvictor]

Tell me more.

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

@AlaskaGuy

Holy shit were you wrong or what?

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

@Duckboy33

 

[4down20]

Are people still making a big deal out of week 9 playoff rankings?

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

Are people still making a big deal out of week 9 playoff rankings?

I mean, I'm sure it will look different at the end of the season.


But a if 0 loss Washington is being jumped by 1 loss T A&M, then surely a 1 loss Washington will be jumped by a 1 loss T A&M........... no?

 

[4down20]

I mean, I'm sure it will look different at the end of the season.

But a if 0 loss Washington is being jumped by 1 loss T A&M, then surely a 1 loss Washington will be jumped by a 1 loss T A&M........... no?

Not really, if Washington is in the playoff picture they will be Pac12 champions and will have won an extra game in the Pac12 championship.

Plus, I don't really think A&M belongs quite that high anyway.

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

Not really, if Washington is in the playoff picture they will be Pac12 champions and will have won an extra game in the Pac12 championship.

Plus, I don't really think A&M belongs quite that high anyway.

Well let the committee know.

 

[4down20]

Well let the committee know.

Why? So their rankings that don't mean shit can be better next week?

 

[TheDayMan]

Well let the committee know.

Do you not remember how much they can change in a given week? Remember TCU?

Relax man...

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

Do you not remember how much they can change in a given week? Remember TCU?

Relax man...

Of coure they can and will change.

But at the very least we should all be able to admit that the committee might take a loss TAMU/Louisville over a 1 loss PAC 12 champ, right?


Right?

 

[B_dub]

Go back and look at the first rankings these last 2 years. They are meaningless with so much more football left to play yet.

 

[TheDayMan]

Of coure they can and will change.

But at the very least we should all be able to admit that the committee might take a loss TAMU/Louisville over a 1 loss PAC 12 champ, right?


Right?

I have no idea...

I'd think they'd give priority to the conference champions, but what I think clearly isn't always the way shit goes. If UW loses a game I accept whatever.

 

[BamaFanAlways]

Of coure they can and will change.

But at the very least we should all be able to admit that the committee might take a loss TAMU/Louisville over a 1 loss PAC 12 champ, right?


Right?

Not really. Conference championships have not been factored in yet,

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

Not really. Conference championships have not been factored in yet,

So you think a 1 loss PAC 12 champ is a playoff lock?

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

I have no idea...

I'd think they'd give priority to the conference champions, but what I think clearly isn't always the way shit goes. If UW loses a game I accept whatever.

So it's not a lock, agree?

 

[TheDayMan]

So it's not a lock, agree?

If they lose, of course not.

 

[hailtoyourvictor]

If they lose, of course not.

Well that's my point. AG and Duckboy were implying a 1 loss PAC 12 conference champ is a playoff lock. I don't believe they are a playoff lock, though they still might get a bid.

 

[TheDayMan]

Well that's my point. AG and Duckboy were implying a 1 loss PAC 12 conference champ is a playoff lock. I don't believe they are a playoff lock, though they still might get a bid.

Is that was this is about? That guy's a dipshit, who cares...

 

[BamaFanAlways]

So you think a 1 loss PAC 12 champ is a playoff lock?

It might depend on who Washington would lose to. Losing to a 4-4 Cal wouldn't make them an easy choice.

 

[ericd7633]

My guess would be a 1 loss Washington would be a lock if the following happened: Michigan beating Ohio State. I actually think Michigan could potentially get in ahead of a 1 loss Washington, but they are probably the only team. A 12-1 Washington conference champion will get them in over A&M, Louisville etc.