- Thread starter
- #1
Montalban
Well-Known Member
Start of a three-game winning streak for the 49ers:
49ers - 27
Cards - 20
49ers - 27
Cards - 20
Start of a three-game winning streak for the 49ers:
49ers - 27
Cards - 20
I know, I know its a pipe dream, right? The Cardinals are so bad though that I think he will do better. If he has a game like he did in Green Bay (minus the last 4 minutes) they'll win. The other guys gotta stop fumbling too.LOL. we will see. Only if Beathard can stop turning the ball over
I know, I know its a pipe dream, right? The Cardinals are so bad though that I think he will do better. If he has a game like he did in Green Bay (minus the last 4 minutes) they'll win. The other guys gotta stop fumbling too.
I'm not sure the 49ers remember what a turnover is. I don't think they've made one all year outside of the lucky pick Exum got.And make some plays. Goff should have been picked off twice in that game.
From what I hear, the 49ers don't think he is the problem. But when you turn the ball over an average of 4 times a game and your defense doesn't create any turnovers, something's got to give.If we lose D Coordinator may lose his job
If we lose D Coordinator may lose his job
I don't think he's even close to losing his job? yes, our D isn't good but the talent is the much larger factor
The biggest talent issue is pass rush. The lack of a pass rush is a huge problem that is putting stress oe rest of the defense. The other issue has been tackling or fundamentals.
No doubt and we all knew this going in. But wanting a top pass rusher and being able to obtain one isn't the same. I didn't see an opportunity in the draft unless someone considers a 2nd or 3rd rounder "solid"?
I didn't see an opportunity in free agency, unless you want to really overspend on a good but not TOP rusher?
I believe they tried hard to trade for Khalil Mack, but he chose to go elsewhere.
We can only hope they HIT on an elite pass rusher in the next draft. Drafting one and hitting one isn't the same thing, as we're now seeing in Solomon Thomas. I know Thomas wasn't drafted as a pass rusher, but he was drafted HIGH and he hasn't hit.
Yes, a pass rusher would be a big difference on D.
Yes that is a glaring weakness with the horrendous DB play right behind them.The biggest talent issue is pass rush. The lack of a pass rush is a huge problem that is putting stress on the rest of the defense. The other issue has been tackling or fundamentals.
Bill Walsh would have made sure he got Mack. These guys should have done the same.No doubt and we all knew this going in. But wanting a top pass rusher and being able to obtain one isn't the same. I didn't see an opportunity in the draft unless someone considers a 2nd or 3rd rounder "solid"?
I didn't see an opportunity in free agency, unless you want to really overspend on a good but not TOP rusher?
I believe they tried hard to trade for Khalil Mack, but he chose to go elsewhere.
We can only hope they HIT on an elite pass rusher in the next draft. Drafting one and hitting one isn't the same thing, as we're now seeing in Solomon Thomas. I know Thomas wasn't drafted as a pass rusher, but he was drafted HIGH and he hasn't hit.
Yes, a pass rusher would be a big difference on D.
Top CB or Pass Rush are high dratt pick or $15-17 million a year Free Agents! Can not miss with the draft picks!
make it draft pickS, as the draft is the lifeblood. You have to have successful drafts to get there, and then you need successful drafts to stay.
We all know not every pick hits and not every pick becomes an All-Pro. But hitting the drafts means getting more talent than other teams.
Bill Walsh would have made sure he got Mack. These guys should have done the same.
Steve Young, Fred Dean......... but its not about what he gave up. When he saw a need he filled it.Even Bill Walsh had his misses. Walsh really wanted Jim Everritt but lost out to the Rams who offered a better deal. IDK if Walsh would have been willing to give up any more than Chicago did. I can't think of a trade Walsh ever made giving up those kinds of draft picks.