I'm done arguing about it Bro, I never wanted the trade taken back, I just wanted one rule. It's done
That's supposed to be round 12 right? And I have nos's pick
I know if anybody loves to trade it's you... I remember one draft you made one trade and as soon as the ink dried you announced another... In all honesty I like the trading, I just don't like when other people feel cheated... I felt it was fair... IMO unless it's extremely over the top position for position, everything else is preference... Getting perhaps the greatest guard in nfl history was like trading a great 1st for a Cy Young pitcher... Right or wrong it fit my scheme... I'll leave it alone just wanted to chime in since it was me who was involved but it all went down while my phone was dying and I was out... I agree either trade or don't... I like the trades but I understand if others don't... My idea is Ritz Nos and UK be the judges of trades so there's no question it's fair... Nos will say no, Ritz will say yes, and you will be the 3rd voice of reason... You know a whole lot about every sport and are usually involved, I'm sure if your not involved in a draft you wouldn't mind looking over a proposal and give your two cents... Just my thoughts...
I appreciate that, but I really think all or nothing is the best way. Reason being is someone will always end up feeling cheated if we rule some as fair and some as not. That's my opinion anyway. One other way we could do it is to have a point system like Ritz suggested, but apply those points in player trade values as well.
Example, if the #1 overall were 5000 points, and each pick dropped 50 points, then the 10th pick would be worth 4500, the 20th worth 4000. So if say you wanted #1 at 5000, you'd need to be within 100 points, so 5000 and 2000 for 4000 and 3000. But use the same numbers AFTER they are drafted, meaning every PLAYER traded keeps the same value from their draft slot and it doesn't just become subjective to the judges opinions on players traded
Todays players are bigger and faster so you cant put them head to head against players 20+ years ago. I am looking at pro bowl appearances, their all-time ranks if a WR,RB,QB,TE. If they are tops in sacks not what they would do if you put them in a game together because you can't compare the athletes of 1970 to the athletes who are currently playing. If you got Ronnie Lott you have the best Safety in the game but I have heard Lott and other hard hitters wouldn't be as dominate today because of all the penalties and new rules in place. That's not how I look at it. You cant judge Lott in what he would do in 2014 but what he did do when he played in the 80's. Just my opinion on the matter.
