Robotech
Well-Known Member
Again, I don’t really understand the financial side in the NBA, so I am totally talking outta my hind quarters here…
I think they WANT to keep Wiggins pretty badly. Now that he has a chip and a few years under Curry, Drey and Iggy, maybe he can step up to be a #1. At least until he hands the reins over to (likely?) JK. Then he transitions to the Iggy role.
I think Porter is all but gone. Looney and Poole are nice keeps, but I question their capability. Looney is good, but is he great? I think his production can be found off the scrap heap (think JaVale McGee…). Poole still has the potential to be a #1 or a #2. He is Curry-lite.
Payton is the real fly in the ointment. He likely WANTS to stay, but he also needs to get paid. He is getting older and hasn’t cashed yet. For his sake, he needs to ignore winning for a while and build his bank account. Probably best for him to just follow the money, and that likely won’t be with the Dubs. Not certain what other teams will see in him, though. Will some team want to pay for a guy who, historically, is basically a glorified G-Leaguer? He looked great in these playoffs, but that is a super SSS. I think the Dubs will be in on him if he is cheep, but once the bidding gets hot, they will tap out.
I don’t think anyone else moves the needle in any way whatsoever (Bjelica, Lee, JTA). Iggy will retire.
No way Wiggins will ever be a #1, but he feels like a must keep player. I love Looney and Payton, but they are role players and can be let go. They both deserve bigger money, and I don't think the Warriors will be able to afford them.
OPJ would be nice to keep if he agrees to MLE. Poole is a must keep, IMO, because he's the only player on the roster other than Curry who can create offense. Plus, and this is a big plus, he's only 22. You could argue that Wiggins is a creator, too, but his career has shown that he's not efficient at doing that.