TREFF
Fantasy Football Guru--??
Pretty sure the dude i wanted to say was Laquon Treadwell... but the point being, I think he's a bustCorey Davis?
As a WMU alum, I thought that was a crazy pick. Caught with his body a lot in college.

Pretty sure the dude i wanted to say was Laquon Treadwell... but the point being, I think he's a bustCorey Davis?
As a WMU alum, I thought that was a crazy pick. Caught with his body a lot in college.
They don’t use 1sts on them though. I’m thinking this breaks the pattern.But the Packers drafted Savion Williams too. They seem to load up on WR and then not feature any of them regularly.
He had that DWI in 2024 so he’d need to interview well to offset that. And his combine was meh.Why did Ollie take such a tumble? In February he was ranked as the RB9. In April, he was RB11. Post draft he was RB16.
4.61 40 in the combine probably took him off a lot of boards altogether.Why did Ollie take such a tumble? In February he was ranked as the RB9. In April, he was RB11. Post draft he was RB16.
And he was drafted in the 5th, as the 15th RB, and barely played at all his rookie year, probably considered, by many, to be lucky to make the team behind Akers and Henderson.Slowest 40-time by RB in 2022: Kyren Williams, Notre Dame – 4.65
Packers have a ridiculous amount of WRs at the moment.
Yeah it makes sense. Everything has to go right for their situation to work out. Needle in a haystackAnd he was drafted in the 5th, as the 15th RB, and barely played at all his rookie year, probably considered, by many, to be lucky to make the team behind Akers and Henderson.
That's what happens to RB's who run a 4.6+
I never said that it was a death sentence, just that that is what happens![]()
I assume at least one of them will be tradedPackers have a ridiculous amount of WRs at the moment.
Watson would be my guessI assume at least one of them will be traded
Kaleb Johnson has a more proven committee member (J. Warren) than Judkins does. It's much more of a probability that Warren takes important touches away than it is that Sampson doesIf there is some concern that Judkins will split touches with Sampson, why is he ranked ahead of Kaleb Johnson?
I doubt PIT stands firm on Rudolph. Especially if the Rodgers and Cousinsntrade rumors are legit.sadly, an offense led by Joe Flacco, is more appealing than one currently led by Mason Rudolph.
As do i, but, I would assume the rankings are based on how things stand at the moment. Should they deal for Cousins, i might change my thoughts. Rodgers wouldn't move the needle for meI doubt PIT stands firm on Rudolph. Especially if the Rodgers and Cousinsntrade rumors are legit.
Even if PIT rolls with Rudolph, a team with an average QB suggests more RB touches to me.
When your QB runs 100+ times, takes opportunities from the RB's. Fields (62 carries) and Wilson (43), won't be around to do that any longer.Just looked at my handy dandy chart of distribution... if Indy's numbers are any indicator of Flacco's influence, the RB distribution (touches) was exactly at the league average 45%. And that's with Taylor as the RB1. Since, CLE may split carries as it sorts out the QB situation, seems PIT may still be a better option of Judkins vs Kaleb.
PIT on the handy dandy chart was 52%, second highest in the league (behind DET 54%).
Just looked at my handy dandy chart of distribution... if Indy's numbers are any indicator of Flacco's influence, the RB distribution (touches) was exactly at the league average 45%. And that's with Taylor as the RB1. Since, CLE may split carries as it sorts out the QB situation, seems PIT may still be a better option of Judkins vs Kaleb.
PIT on the handy dandy chart was 52%, second highest in the league (behind DET 54%).
When your QB runs 100+ times, takes opportunities from the RB's. Fields (62 carries) and Wilson (43), won't be around to do that any longer.
Wonder what that RB distribution was for Colts games with Flacco (9 carries), vs Colts games with Richardson (86 carries)