TREFF
Fantasy Football Guru--??
Five games without Nick Chubb and 2 years less age on the arm tooOr we could just look at the numbers from the last time Flacco ran this same offense? 5 games of slinging it if memory is accurate
Five games without Nick Chubb and 2 years less age on the arm tooOr we could just look at the numbers from the last time Flacco ran this same offense? 5 games of slinging it if memory is accurate
Five games without Nick Chubb and 2 years less age on the arm too
Haha, well no, he won't, but he will have two 'highly touted' rookies.. not Jerome FordGot a feeling he's not gonna have Chubb for these games either, Jeudy and Tillman to the moon!!!
Thats the other side of the coin to me. CLE signs Flacco. Then they draft 2 QB. They draft 2 RB. I question their off-season decisions.Haha, well no, he won't, but he will have two 'highly touted' rookies.. not Jerome Ford
Last time Flacco was the QB, Njoku final looked like a decent TE. Perhaps that happen again or perhaps not - hard to say.Got a feeling he's not gonna have Chubb for these games either, Jeudy and Tillman to the moon!!!
Last time Flacco was the QB, Njoku final looked like a decent TE. Perhaps that happen again or perhaps not - hard to say.
Only issue I have with PIT is before they drafted Johnson, Warren was going to be the guy and he proved it. In limited touches, 4.8 ypc. Only time will tell...maybe this is one benefit in having a rookie draft LATER. Totally fine with when we draft now, just sayin...going through camp and even some of preseason can tell quite a bit more especially this year.Just looked at my handy dandy chart of distribution... if Indy's numbers are any indicator of Flacco's influence, the RB distribution (touches) was exactly at the league average 45%. And that's with Taylor as the RB1. Since, CLE may split carries as it sorts out the QB situation, seems PIT may still be a better option of Judkins vs Kaleb.
PIT on the handy dandy chart was 52%, second highest in the league (behind DET 54%).
If they had drafted Harvey or Johnson as that second RB, and not Sampson.. I'd be right there with you Judkins was/is/will be better than Johnson or Harvey. I had Sampson as my #3 RB though, so I totally buy a 50/50 committee being a probability.Interesting seeing this discussion pushing Judkins down towards Johnson and Harvey range due to landing spot, where i think Judkins is clearly better than both
On the other hand it's also more of a probability that Sampson seriously competes for the long-term feature role. He and Judkins are really close IMO.Kaleb Johnson has a more proven committee member (J. Warren) than Judkins does. It's much more of a probability that Warren takes important touches away than it is that Sampson does
And sadly, an offense led by Joe Flacco, is more appealing than one currently led by Mason Rudolph.
Yeah, zackly.For what its worth, PFF has Samson and Johnson ranked above Judkins (prior to the NFL draft).
![]()
2025 NFL Draft Rankings: Running backs
PFF's top running back prospects in the 2025 NFL Draft, along with some initial scouting notes courtesy of lead draft analyst Trevor Sikkema.www.pff.com