- Thread starter
- #201
PDay8810
Well-Known Member
at 12Overshown is out for most or all of next season ans Micah plays a lot of DE. Campbell would work
no thank you
at 12Overshown is out for most or all of next season ans Micah plays a lot of DE. Campbell would work
I'm just saying, if they went that route, he is a darn good player. Like the TE I like, that's not a position they'll go after but that little shit is gonna be Gronk made over. It'll be interesting to see what direction the team goes because they really can't miss for need anywhere. I think what they need the very most is a legitimate WR threat across from Lamb or a physical DT(or two)at 12
no thank you
you see how fast dj liked your response?I'm just saying, if they went that route, he is a darn good player. Like the TE I like, that's not a position they'll go after but that little shit is gonna be Gronk made over. It'll be interesting to see what direction the team goes because they really can't miss for need anywhere. I think what they need the very most is a legitimate WR threat across from Lamb or a physical DT(or two)
just figured he was passing through, he's got all kinds of West Coast action in the teams he supports lolyou see how fast dj liked your response?
not a good post for 12.
don't fed the troll.
He could get encouraged and post here more often.
LOL
problem is.If Grant is the maneater I was thinking of earlier then I’m all in. Or was it a Graham?
I believe comp picks are tradableIt seems our picks are 12, 44, 76, 148, 187, 248
with compensatory picks 168, 170, 171, 209
Subject to Change.
aren't compensatory picks tradable now?
I really like the 12 and yes on the comp picksIt seems our picks are 12, 44, 76, 148, 187, 248
with compensatory picks 168, 170, 171, 209
Subject to Change.
aren't compensatory picks tradable now?
Yrs Sir. And the 4th we gave up was 107. There will be some really attractive players on the board at 107It seems our picks are 12, 44, 76, 148, 187, 248
with compensatory picks 168, 170, 171, 209
Subject to Change.
aren't compensatory picks tradable now?
I am going to watch the TE at Penn State vs ND. Ferguson has really disappointed.I'm just saying, if they went that route, he is a darn good player. Like the TE I like, that's not a position they'll go after but that little shit is gonna be Gronk made over. It'll be interesting to see what direction the team goes because they really can't miss for need anywhere. I think what they need the very most is a legitimate WR threat across from Lamb or a physical DT(or two)
Ceiling Gronk, Floor Kittle. Gonna be a great player for somebodyI am going to watch the TE at Penn State vs ND. Ferguson has really disappointed.
problem is.
Graham looks to be gone by 7 or 8.
In the games Dak played, and excluding week 1 which he left early after being injured, Ferguson average 5.833 receptions per game. Over 17 games that is 99 receptions. On the flip side he had zero TDs this year. I didn't realize that.I am going to watch the TE at Penn State vs ND. Ferguson has really disappointed.
Floor Kittle??? Come on. I'm not saying he isn't going to be a great player, but...Ceiling Gronk, Floor Kittle. Gonna be a great player for somebody
I think the kid is going to be that good. I would never take a TE in round one otherwise. If I'm wrong that one will sure make me look silly lol. But I don't think so. I think that's a HOFer some dayFloor Kittle??? Come on. I'm not saying he isn't going to be a great player, but...
Not good. I think it also is telling that Dowdle only had two touch downs. But when most of your scoring is being done by the kicker?In the games Dak played, and excluding week 1 which he left early after being injured, Ferguson average 5.833 receptions per game. Over 17 games that is 99 receptions. On the flip side he had zero TDs this year. I didn't realize that.
I also think your TE is going to be a player. I don't think you are wrong.I think the kid is going to be that good. I would never take a TE in round one otherwise. If I'm wrong that one will sure make me look silly lol. But I don't think so. I think that's a HOFer some day
Agreed. I really think it's the most important part of a passing game the way things are played now. If you can line up with two TE's, it forces teams out of the nickel which is the base for most teams now. Great TE's are such mismatches, it makes everyone around them better. KC lost the best deep threat in the game in T. Hill, but kept winning. Kelce is the guy that kills teams. For SF, after CMC, its Kittle who kills you. IMO, when we play Philly, if we are healthy at corner we match up well with them outside but Dallas Goedert just beats the shit out of us. Mark Andrews for the Ravens. Sam LaPorta now for Detroit. I like Ferguson, solid player, but IMO he us no where near those guys. Now if he were your 2nd TE in a 2 TE set...enjoy defending thatI also think your TE is going to be a player. I don't think you are wrong.
And when you see that some of the better teams have studs at TE. Kelce and Laporte come to mind.
I get it. Good news for you, we will definitely go a different direction. All I'll say is, if we were on the clock last year and about to take Guyton, and if for whatever reason, Brock Bowers were still available, and you knew what they would become, are you still taking Guyton? Same question for the previous year with Mazi? Just interested*Schmoop trying not to get involved in 1st rd. TE conversations*