- Thread starter
- #21
PDay8810
Well-Known Member
Parsons said all the right things today at his camp media session.
If you differentiate between football field Micah and social media Micah, he usually doesParsons said all the right things today at his camp media session.
Yes but for me saying he has spoken with Zim and is... (lol) all in with Zim's vision of his role within this defense.If you differentiate between football field Micah and social media Micah, he usually does
Understood. I didn't hear the specific interview so I will go find it at some point today. I was speaking more in generalities. Personally I have zero concerns about Micah's desire to win. His face and effort every play on the field tells me all I need to know - would like to see him not crash down so hard and trust the system more but that should have been forced by the coaches. I do, however, really really really wish he would limit the SM and pod casts because it drives me crazy listening to what he says there even if taken out of context.Yes but for me saying he has spoken with Zim and is... (lol) all in with Zim's vision of his role within this defense.
AND
He was perfect with the wanting to live in Dallas like Emmitt & Irvin...remaining part of the community stuff.."THE RIGHT WAY"
Hit all the points about future salary. Young man was good.
listen to it when you get a chance. It was good.Understood. I didn't hear the specific interview so I will go find it at some point today. I was speaking more in generalities. Personally I have zero concerns about Micah's desire to win. His face and effort every play on the field tells me all I need to know - would like to see him not crash down so hard and trust the system more but that should have been forced by the coaches. I do, however, really really really wish he would limit the SM and pod casts because it drives me crazy listening to what he says there even if taken out of context.
It going to be real interesting to see what Zimmer has planned for Parsons. I am hoping he is moved all over the line and let him play some linebacker. They need to put Parsons in position to use that speed more. Parsons fits Zimmer's scheme as a blitzing line backer. I am not saying playing entire games at LB of course.Yes but for me saying he has spoken with Zim and is... (lol) all in with Zim's vision of his role within this defense.
AND
He was perfect with the wanting to live in Dallas like Emmitt & Irvin...remaining part of the community stuff.."THE RIGHT WAY"
Hit all the points about future salary. Young man was good.
Looks like Dak in the first half against Green Bay. Only a lot younger and cheaper.
Or........... we can draft a RB in the draft next year, instead of the QB. They are much easier to hit on in the draft than QB.Looks like Dak in the first half against Green Bay. Only a lot younger and cheaper.
Or I can post some first day of practice for Dak at 24 when he was clanking balls all over the place. The difference is, with Lance_or a drafted QB....next year we wouldn't be starting Rico Dowdle at RB and praying 2 rookies can be solid starters on the OL this year
We will be drafting a lot of things after committing half our cap space to 3 guys. I would keep Lamb and Micah, who are both better players but will still cost $20M a year leads than Dak. Each. I know you want to keep Dak. Which one of the other two do you part ways with, Lamb or Parsons? And are you really gonna sit there and tell me, that paying a 31 year old Dak $56M+ per year from now till he is 35, and them losing one of those two, that this team will ever have a shot at a Super Bowl the next 5 years? I think ZERO shot. I do think spending Dak's money on several other positions plus still drafting well will give us a team a young QB can win with. Kike SF today. And like Dak when he walked into an offense with 3 HOF caliber OL and the best RB in footballOr........... we can draft a RB in the draft next year, instead of the QB. They are much easier to hit on in the draft than QB.
Brother I know we have a difference of opinion on Dak. I have stayed out of all your dak convos. we been there.We will be drafting a lot of things after committing half our cap space to 3 guys. I would keep Lamb and Micah, who are both better players but will still cost $20M a year leads than Dak. Each. I know you want to keep Dak. Which one of the other two do you part ways with, Lamb or Parsons? And are you really gonna sit there and tell me, that paying a 31 year old Dak $56M+ per year from now till he is 35, and them losing one of those two, that this team will ever have a shot at a Super Bowl the next 5 years? I think ZERO shot. I do think spending Dak's money on several other positions plus still drafting well will give us a team a young QB can win with. Kike SF today. And like Dak when he walked into an offense with 3 HOF caliber OL and the best RB in football
Not mad Bro. As I've said, for the predicament the Cowboys are in I blame Jerry 1000% and Dak zero. He deserves the money he wants as does Lamb and Parsons. The Cowboys have created this mess and I'm not sure what their endgame is, other than incompetence. Dak is a good player and in today's market he deserves $55M. My only objection to giving him that is there are slim to none instances where a team paid a 31 year old QB who is not an undisputed HOF the most money of any player in NFL history and gone to the Super Bowl after. Dak without question makes us better the next few years but he isn't winning a Super Bowl with less talent instead of more. That's my only problemBrother I know we have a difference of opinion on Dak. I have stayed out of all your dak convos. we been there.
Was just having fun with the RB comment. (thus the grin) Us starting Dowdle is a Cowboys fault. Not a Dak fault. Many quality RBs were signed for small amount of commitment. But back to my comment. RB as volatile as the position is. We should be drafting one just about every draft IMO. Just like Trench players.
Unlike Lineman, QBs & other positions. RBs have a very short shelf life on an original team.
It would make sense. This FO will screw it up no matter who they sign or don't sign though. It's what they do. Any other FO would have signed Lamb by now. Instead these dipchits let the player hold out so he not getting practice reps.We will be drafting a lot of things after committing half our cap space to 3 guys. I would keep Lamb and Micah, who are both better players but will still cost $20M a year leads than Dak. Each. I know you want to keep Dak. Which one of the other two do you part ways with, Lamb or Parsons? And are you really gonna sit there and tell me, that paying a 31 year old Dak $56M+ per year from now till he is 35, and them losing one of those two, that this team will ever have a shot at a Super Bowl the next 5 years? I think ZERO shot. I do think spending Dak's money on several other positions plus still drafting well will give us a team a young QB can win with. Kike SF today. And like Dak when he walked into an offense with 3 HOF caliber OL and the best RB in football
What Jerry said the other day is brain dead. Lamb was first team All Pro last year for Goodness sake. He's 25 years old. What the Hell else do you need to knowIt would make sense. This FO will screw it up no matter who they sign or don't sign though. It's what they do. Any other FO would have signed Lamb by now. Instead these dipchits let the player hold out so he not getting practice reps.
You probably shouldn't read the camp updates about Lance if you are going to be sensitive about them or feel the need to defend them.Looks like Dak in the first half against Green Bay. Only a lot younger and cheaper.
Or I can post some first day of practice for Dak at 24 when he was clanking balls all over the place. The difference is, with Lance_or a drafted QB....next year we wouldn't be starting Rico Dowdle at RB and praying 2 rookies can be solid starters on the OL this year
Defend what? It's was the first practice LMAO. I think the kid is gonna be fine. I'm at least willing to give him till the end of preseason. How do you defend $56M for Dak after the Green Bay game? Run that first half stat line back. I'll give you one. 27-0. At homeYou probably shouldn't read the camp updates about Lance if you are going to be sensitive about them or feel the need to defend them.
Exactly. A meaningless practice, which is why I was wondering why you felt the need to defend him and attack Dak. You sound like the Political board defending their guy by attacking the other. Everyone is giving Lance at least the preseason, so again, not sure what you are talking about. Lastly, when did I defend giving Dak $56M (which he hasn't even got)?I've said over and over I wouldn't extend him this year.Defend what? It's was the first practice LMAO. I think the kid is gonna be fine. I'm at least willing to give him till the end of preseason. How do you defend $56M for Dak after the Green Bay game? Run that first half stat line back. I'll give you one. 27-0. At home
Whatever dude. You said I should listen to insider reports LMAO. Keep ripping the kid, he will be fineExactly. A meaningless practice, which is why I was wondering why you felt the need to defend him and attack Dak. You sound like the Political board defending their guy by attacking the other. Everyone is giving Lance at least the preseason, so again, not sure what you are talking about. Lastly, when did I defend giving Dak $56M (which he hasn't even got)?I've said over and over I wouldn't extend him this year.
is Trey a They/Them? or did you mean to say him? Or is he sensitive about multiple people?You probably shouldn't read the camp updates about Lance if you are going to be sensitive about them or feel the need to defend them.
Them as in the reportsis Trey a They/Them? or did you mean to say him? Or is he sensitive about multiple people?
Now I am confused
What insider reports did I say you should listen to?Whatever dude. You said I should listen to insider reports LMAO. Keep ripping the kid, he will be fine