dtgold88
Well-Known Member
It's extreme. as so often will be with you and that's cool. He didn't suggest Garland for Beal so there's that. And, no, you do not know what they think of a barely 21-year-old who already has shown improvement in year 2. Hell, I didn't think much of him as a rookie and said so, but he looks a lot better. If anything needs to shoot more. And, yes, also possible they don;t think much of him.That isn’t an extreme comment man.
You are just too much.
Your boy made a stupid homerific trade idea that is completely unrealistic. Maybe you should try calling him on it instead of your usual “but we don’t know what his trade value is until he is dealt”.
Yeah we can make some pretty good assumptions about player values based other deals we have seen.
Garland has value. Not enough to return a star like Beal. Wiseman would get closer to doing so.
Drummond could have some value either as an expiring contract if they want that or maybe they think he's kind of good and would like to keep him? Might need to do better than lightly protected pick though from Cavs.