dtgold88
Well-Known Member
only saw 4th qtr. of Cavs' game but was not a fan of her (or the other) at all.Is this a practice trial for these summer league announcers, this one woman talking has no idea what is going on in the game lol
only saw 4th qtr. of Cavs' game but was not a fan of her (or the other) at all.Is this a practice trial for these summer league announcers, this one woman talking has no idea what is going on in the game lol
the difference is- the Cavs were coming off of years of extraordinary success and having spent tons of cap room, tons of draft assets and were not developing young guys sicne vets were playingDude. I am not the one who doesn’t get it.
It isn’t about hypotheticals.
It is about what actually happened.
1 team aggressively dealt away their best players to improve lottery odds while the other just plain sucked.
Not similar.
gotta say- with the proverbial caveat- its just summer league- but Okoro looks bigger and stronger and like hes really developing. I have heard that in reports from team officials as well. When he started playing last December he was a 19 year old that was clueless- by the end he had like a 30 point game.only saw 4th qtr. of Cavs' game but was not a fan of her (or the other) at all.
I will say without any reservation - id take Okoro over Wiseman EASILY right now. Not even a question.
I am not as confident as you but not a crazy notion. He's definitely bigger and had an NBA body last year it seemed. Looked like he handled the ball better and ran the offense, even though often double teamed (which wouldn't happen in real games). More aggressive and made shots.gotta say- with the proverbial caveat- its just summer league- but Okoro looks bigger and stronger and like hes really developing. I have heard that in reports from team officials as well. When he started playing last December he was a 19 year old that was clueless- by the end he had like a 30 point game.
I will say without any reservation - id take Okoro over Wiseman EASILY right now. Not even a question.
Mobley looks smooth and i like his shot motion. He obviously has no clue what the NBA game is about yet- and needs to get a lot stronger. admittedly- bigs do take quite a while longer to develop than guards.I am not as confident as you but not a crazy notion. He's definitely bigger and had an NBA body last year it seemed. Looked like he handled the ball better and ran the offense, even though often double teamed (which wouldn't happen in real games). More aggressive and made shots.
But, yeah, of course the caveat of just Summer League. No doubt rather they look good than not. Mobley has struggled some with consistency of shot but am seeing what was said predraft about athleticism, defense, etc.
Mention of shot motion is something I noticed yesterday. FTs I saw him take late was encouraging as not only did he knock them down but good form.Mobley looks smooth and i like his shot motion. He obviously has no clue what the NBA game is about yet- and needs to get a lot stronger. admittedly- bigs do take quite a while longer to develop than guards.
Wiseman too or just Cavs big men?Mobley looks smooth and i like his shot motion. He obviously has no clue what the NBA game is about yet- and needs to get a lot stronger. admittedly- bigs do take quite a while longer to develop than guards.
the difference is- the Cavs were coming off of years of extraordinary success and having spent tons of cap room, tons of draft assets and were not developing young guys sicne vets were playing
the Sixers actually HAD assets because they were very mediocre to bad.
The Sixers started their tanking with actual assets. The Cavs had just watched LeBron leave and were coming off 4 years of nothing but going for it, spending more luxury tax money then half the NBA teams combined have ever spent in their histories, trading multiple first round draft picks, and playing vets at the expense of developing players- which is what you do when you are mediocre.
and i would say 4 straight Finals appearances and a title is "extraordinary success". To all but a handful of teams in the league that is better than what a lot of teams have done in their entire existence.
a mediocre Cavs team would certainly have continued to develop Joe Harris- but when you are all in- you dont have time to develop that type of guy.
Russ Smith? How did we have a "better head start"? Because we picked 8th in a draft where most thought the best players would be found in the top 5?what?
you started with a top 10 pick
you bungled the Russ smith contract
but you had a better head start than most rebuilding teams who just made the finals
100%
two of the worst contracts in the league.
you can find a shooter for the mle.
stagger the minutes of Ben abs dray to some extent.
you get a 100k car for 10k, you do it and figure it out
Yeah.......losing their 2 best draft pick for an entire season or even seasons didn't help at all, right? So, yeah, you don't get it.
the difference is- the Cavs were coming off of years of extraordinary success and having spent tons of cap room, tons of draft assets and were not developing young guys sicne vets were playing
the Sixers actually HAD assets because they were very mediocre to bad.
The Sixers started their tanking with actual assets. The Cavs had just watched LeBron leave and were coming off 4 years of nothing but going for it, spending more luxury tax money then half the NBA teams combined have ever spent in their histories, trading multiple first round draft picks, and playing vets at the expense of developing players- which is what you do when you are mediocre.
and i would say 4 straight Finals appearances and a title is "extraordinary success". To all but a handful of teams in the league that is better than what a lot of teams have done in their entire existence.
a mediocre Cavs team would certainly have continued to develop Joe Harris- but when you are all in- you dont have time to develop that type of guy.
Russ Smith? How did we have a "better head start"? Because we picked 8th in a draft where most thought the best players would be found in the top 5?
I mean, they would not have taken a perfectly healthy Embiid for fear he'd play?No, also part of the process.
The held out Embiid and Simmons a lot longer than they needed to.
That is the one similarity they had with Cleveland.
I mean, they would not have taken a perfectly healthy Embiid for fear he'd play?
It was a "pretty major asset" if it were expected to be when acquired (top 3). But it wasn't. Luckily they made the most of it (or close to the most).because what finals team that turns to a rebuild has a top 10 pick.
whcih was what he was trying to say
that’s a pretty major asset
Of course...but he wasn't. aAe you suggesting Philly only took him because they wanted an injured player who couldn't play, not because, ya know, they thought he'd be pretty good?If embiid was perfectly healthy he’d have gone 1-1
and if the cavs were smart, wouldn’t have included him in a love trade
It was a "pretty major asset" if it were expected to be when acquired (top 3). But it wasn't. Luckily they made the most of it (or close to the most).
They also gave away many of their other assets in trying to keep winning titles.
Of course...but he wasn't. aAe you suggesting Philly only took him because they wanted an injured player who couldn't play, not because, ya know, they thought he'd be pretty good?