Heatles84
Well-Known Member
Lakers are better suited to handing such a situation now with Russ onboard than they were previously.
They are. But we know what a team led by Westbrook looks like.
Lakers are better suited to handing such a situation now with Russ onboard than they were previously.
Definitely a joke, but people are way too fn sensitive. Life is too short.
AllWhich 1?
Seems like he was an exceptional shooter overall and from 3 as a rookie but has struggled some since. Thoughts on why? I guess stuggled when Lebron added. Would think should make things easy but some don't play as well with him. Struggled a bit in NO, as well.He would be backing up Sexton presumably.
There were doubts the Big 3 in Miami could work but they all made it work, And I don't have to tell you James was on that team.They are. But we know what a team led by Westbrook looks like.
All big men develop the same? That is news to me. Some are more talented than others. Embiid's first year playing he averaged 20 ppg and almost 3 bpg. We will see with Mobley but Wiseman and Mobley aren't comparable for a lot of reasons. Only reason they are comparable is bc they are both athletic, lanky and drafted high and that's pretty much it.No, big men take longer to develop.....he'll have an adjustment period like Wiseman did in GS.
They are. But we know what a team led by Westbrook looks like.
you don't remember right. TT was a FA and chose to leave. I'm sure some others have dropped off since then who were not worth keeping. But - right or wrong - the idea he paid Love should have showed you were off base.Yet dropped TT and a few others if I remember right.
Seems like he was an exceptional shooter overall and from 3 as a rookie but has struggled some since. Thoughts on why? I guess stuggled when Lebron added. Would think should make things easy but some don't play as well with him. Struggled a bit in NO, as well.
...and clearly, the front office was smoking somethingthe idea he paid Love should have showed you were off base.
And the offense was painful to watch last season when we werre without James and AD.With a superstar teammate and depth around them? Deep playoffs? We're not talking about Lebron missing a full season. Any team that loses their top star for the season is looking ahead to the next season ultimately.
There were doubts the Big 3 in Miami could work but they all made it work, And I don't have to tell you James was on that team.
That didn't really workout but in their defense it didn't hurt the team...they were entering a rebuild and technically still in a rebuild. Even this year...who would they attract in FA? Next year they can buy him out and still no guarantee they can attract FA's bc it's CLE. They will have to draft (like they have been doing) and/or make a trade to acquire a player. That being said, I think we can all look back at this point and the Love signing was a bit premature but it also didn't hurt them imo...and clearly, the front office was smoking something
With the glut of guards already on the Lakers, not sure where Green would fit in, and who starts? Would welcome him for sure, but some of these signings are going to be upset about minutes...
He's not signing with the Cavs.....LOL.
We're talking about wear and tear. The Big 3 in Miami were all in their prime. Westbrook's an "old" 32, Lebron's going to be 37 before the playoffs start, and AD is often injured.
I think it ultimately works in LA, we'll see if it results in a title. But the original point was more on how Westbrook may start hitting his decline given his style of play and miles he has.
seems like what Okoro offers, but certainly another like that could help and would be great if he could get back that shooting stroke (if we acquire him, obviously).All the kids' roles shifted when Lebron arrived. He's a 3 and D type ultimately, with more emphasis on the D IMO.
Maybe...but the idea he said they tried to cut salary was completely false....and clearly, the front office was smoking something