- Thread starter
- #201
seahawksfan234
Radical Moderate
If I may interject here:
Again these kids are given stars by recruiting people that to be fair, " never really played a down of college football to make them so called " experts".
I know what your thinking, " No way Mcnabb, there is some great recruiter out there that have played!"
Well here is my example, do you all remember the great QB UW had by the name of Johnny Deroucher?
If not I'll pause here and you can google him..........
Okay now that you have googled him let me tell you he runs one of the high school off campus programs here in the state and gets kids from all over. Now him and his staff put out info to colleges about "their guys" and of course the scouts show up at the camps his company puts on. Now of course there is nothing wrong for a guy to do something like this, it helps the kids.
Here is the problem I have with Johnny, hes a quitter! He was over hyped coming into UW only to flame out faster then Alaska guy walking into one of the local waterholes up there in the ice bowl wearing short shorts and crocs!
The guy never played a down, ( stat check me on that please) why in the hell would I pay thousands of dollars for my kid to learn from someone that quit when he was given the golden ticket?
My long winded comment is simple, we all hear the term "OKG". As a coach we all want the kids that will go out and work their asses off to compete and win. It's that simple. In my days they use to call it " diamonds in the rough".
There is nothing wrong with targeting guys you know you can coach up, they will work their asses off, and represent in the real world as good guys.
SF you bring up three games : Bama, Penn St and Ohio St. Two out of the three they had a chance to win two of them but time ran out on them. Bama they simple didn't have the depth plain as simple!
McNabb, you're always welcome to interject. What fun is this board without lively debates among friends?
I have to start by saying that I don't believe having played college football is a prerequisite to being able to evaluate talent. There are plenty of incredible scouts, coaches and general managers who didn't even play high school football. We could disagree on this point, but that's fair.
I won't lie, I did need to Google Johnny Deroucher. The result I received was an autocorrect for Johnny DuRocher who was a QB from Spanaway. I don't know if that's who you're referencing, but I'll stop before I look too stupid.
I believe the money that kids pay to put on these camps is to get recognition, as you mentioned. I don't know if this was the point you're trying to make, but you're right that the scouting process with high school players is flawed. There are plenty of kids whose parents can't afford sending them to Ford Sports Performance, paying for them to fly out to some expensive camp, etc. Going to these camps is almost like hiring a lobby organization because you know they're going to hype the kids up to make their program generate more revenue.
The biggest issue with the Bama, Penn State, Ohio State games is I believe that had we recruited at the level we have the past few years, I think that would've been enough to turn the needle.
I still do believe that elite recruiting is important, but you definitely did bring up things that I generally don't take into consideration when thinking about building a program.
Sorry for the essay response. As you've probably learned by now, when I start talking (or typing) I can't shut up. I'm this long winded in person as well. Probably why I get invited to so many gatherings, they know if things get awkward I'll just start yapping my face off.