Why would we discuss IFs when we have reality right in front of us? And I don't meant the Pats season I mean the entire NFL season.
Why not discuss ifs.
and damn that's a good argument. It seems lost that in certain circumstances we should be acting for the good of all. The truth is the payers face little risk of death on long term effects (or so is being said), but the person they pass the virus onto may be less fortunate.
Exactly and it not about life or death permanent lung scarring can occur with this crap. I get it it's a money grab in the end I just don't think it was worth the risk.
I wont discuss ifs because its all conjecture, we know for a fact there is a Pandemic we know for a fact it's cycling through the league.
Good rebuttal... and we can't answer these questions until the pandemic has played itself out. Maybe heard immunization kicks in or a can drug/supplement controls it. Or maybe we have two more years of somewhat quarantining. It's really sad when someone dies because someone else took a risk.
We know for a fact that it is cycling through every aspect of our lives.
and we should address these issue one at a time? Maybe we'll get pimps to stop killing prostitutes, then move on to the other items on the list?
Just to clarify, though I'm pretty sure you got my point... Just because there's overt focus on an item, that doesn't mean there's no focus on other items too. The fact that we can have a list like this sucks enough without all the infighting that goes on about how to address them.
The infighting was direct at the world.... and no apology needed since your stupid shit makes me laugh.
I once would have agreed - but now I know plenty of people otherwise healthy, have had ingering symptoms and sometimes permanent......
Southside: please elaborate for the benefit of all of us.
I have contact with a lot of people - many of which come from other areas.
