bksballer89
Most Popular Member
The Kings just had a 4 on 2 fastbreak....They somehow did not score and it ended up as a 2 on 1 Wizards fastbreak
Jackson makes sense with the Suns or Lakers, while the 76ers would probably rather get Ball.Yeah no doubt. I have yet to see a mock that did not have a Fultz going #1. I actually don't recall seeing a mock without Fultz, Ball, and Jackson.
Would the Lakers still take Ball though if they get the 2nd pick with Russell already there? I think Jackson would be the best way to go unless they don't think Russell is their PG of the future.
Jackson makes sense with the Suns or Lakers, while the 76ers would probably rather get Ball.
Going with the TanKings plan. Sucks that Buddy has gone ice cold in this half after 18 in the first half but it's part of rookie struggles. WCS(13 and 12), Hield(18 and 5), and Skal(8 and 5 in 14 minutes) all still showing off their potential.The Kings just had a 4 on 2 fastbreak....They somehow did not score and it ended up as a 2 on 1 Wizards fastbreak
Monk would make sense at SG but drafting him 2nd or 3rd would be a stretch imo. Wouldn't make total sense for Boston to draft a PG with IT playing great, but you know they will.Yeah agree. I know Mr. Ball wants his son to go to LA but I just don't see the sense with Russell there already. They need a SG. Ingram is a SF. To have drafted your starting PG, SG, and SF in the last 3 drafts would be pretty cool
Monk would make sense at SG but drafting him 2nd or 3rd would be a stretch imo. Wouldn't make total sense for Boston to draft a PG with IT playing great, but you know they will.
So basically there is no need to watch the Warriors/Spurs tomorrow. Kerr is resting most of his guys.
I'm really liking Cauley-Stein.
Yeah agree. I know Mr. Ball wants his son to go to LA but I just don't see the sense with Russell there already. They need a SG. Ingram is a SF. To have drafted your starting PG, SG, and SF in the last 3 drafts would be pretty cool