what odds did you get?Lol, I already put $200 on the Heat to win the title
that Pels pick is looking pretty nice....lol....12 point lead for the Kings at halftime, not good for the tanKings. At least Buddy and Skal are playing well.
i doubt it. The NBA has always been about high end talent.I thought Kyrie was 'all that'???
I'm not getting stupid and saying the Cavs will lose in the East anytime soon, but there aren't that many LeBrons.
With the new crazy salaries, and even crazier incentives for players to stay where they are, maybe the wave of the future is going to be what the Heat have now?
I love having a solid group of players on the court for the entire 48.
It gives you some leeway if someone does get hurt.
Imagine how bad the Cavs would be without James, or the Thunder without Westbrook.
Tell you when I get home, I'm shit faced at the bar watching FSU playwhat odds did you get?
in this draft coming away with 2 top 10 picks would give you some nice building blcoks for the futureI'd be very happy if the Kings end up with 2 picks in the top 7 or 8, the Pelicans pick needs to stay out of the top 3 though.
are you stealing any crab-legs in their honor? jumping up on a bar room table yelling fuck her in her pussy? lol.Tell you when I get home, I'm shit faced at the bar watching FSU play
No Steph, Dray, Klay, or Iggy.
Buddy, Skal, WCS, and even Malachi look like good building blocks already. If they get a PG and SF to go with those first 3, that's a good starting 5 for the future. And they have their own pick in 2018 which should be high. I'm excited about the future of the Kings, but like you said they still need to make the right choices in the draft.in this draft coming away with 2 top 10 picks would give you some nice building blcoks for the future
you just gotta pick the rgith guys for once. a lot easier said then done....as i said- even guys taken in the top 5 only make at least one all star team about 35% of the time.
i agree- PG and SF....if two similar players at each position are on the board- take the SF- a lot easier to find a PG that has big time potential then it is to find a SF with all star potential. the league is overflowing with pg's---an elite SF is a game changer.Buddy, Skal, WCS, and even Malachi look like good building blocks already. If they get a PG and SF to go with those 3, that's a good starting 5 for the future. And they have their own pick in 2018 which should be high. I'm excited about the future of the Kings, but like you said they still need to make the right choices in the draft.
There are 4 PG's I'd be happy if they got(Fultz, Ball, Smith, and Ntilikina) but the first 2 they have very little chance to get. For SF's, I'm hoping for Isaac or Tatum.i agree- PG and SF....if two similar players at each position are on the board- take the SF- a lot easier to find a PG that has big time potential then it is to find a SF with all star potential. the league is overflowing with pg's---an elite SF is a game changer.
i like Malik Monk a lot --- but it seems he would be kind of redundant with hield....There are 4 PG's I'd be happy if they got(Fultz, Ball, Smith, and Ntilikina) but the first 2 they have very little chance to get. For SF's, I'm hoping for Isaac or Tatum.
There are 4 PG's I'd be happy if they got(Fultz, Ball, Smith, and Ntilikina) but the first 2 they have very little chance to get. For SF's, I'm hoping for Isaac or Tatum.
As much as I dislike Russell, he has a good ceiling along with Ingram. Just takes time to see how high it is. Monk is a talented scorer, but they need more of a true PG. I'd be happy with one of those 3(Jackson, Fultz, Ball) but they are probably 1-3.i like Malik Monk a lot --- but it seems he would be kind of redundant with hield....
Jackson would be amazing- but he will be gone....fultz and ball will prob be gone too- but ya never know- its possible.
man- if the Lakers are able to add Fultz, Ball or Jackson- any of those 3 would automatically become the highest ceiling player on their team since a young andrew bynum.
im justsaying - if you are top 3- regardless of position- i think you are taking fultz, ball, jackson- prob in that order...boston def doesnt need a pg with thomas and rozier but i think they take one--- either fultz or ball- just becuase they are elite level prospects- lakers dont need one with russell- but russell has the size (if not the athletic ability) to move to the 2- or they could just trade him.As much as I dislike Russell, he has a good ceiling along with Ingram. Just takes time to see how high it is. Monk is a talented scorer, but they need more of a true PG. I'd be happy with one of those 3(Jackson, Fultz, Ball) but they are probably 1-3.
Fultz is the clear cut #1 imo, and yes those look like the top 3. Better to have too many talented players at one position than none at all.im justsaying - if you are top 3- regardless of position- i think you are taking fultz, ball, jackson- prob in that order...boston def doesnt need a pg with thomas and rozier but i think they take one--- either fultz or ball- just becuase they are elite level prospects- lakers dont need one with russell- but russell has the size (if not the athletic ability) to move to the 2- or they could just trade him.
Fultz is the clear cut #1 imo, and yes those look like the top 3. Better to have too many talented players at one position than none at all.