broncosmitty
Banned in Europe
Yeah, it's a tough combo. Zero receivers in 09, a lot of great players missing in 44. Will definitely need to be strategic
My first five picks might be relievers.
Gonna be some garbage teams imo.
Yeah, it's a tough combo. Zero receivers in 09, a lot of great players missing in 44. Will definitely need to be strategic
Only need three, that helpsMy first five picks might be relievers.
Gonna be some garbage teams imo.
Some positions are pretty deep, some others.....09*44*79 that just looks ugly and I haven’t looked at anything. Whoever thought of changing the years...![]()
@femurov I desperately wanted to post in the Broncos "Elway" thread but didn't out of respect to you.
I wanted to say, "I came here thinking this was a thread about the most overrated QB of all time"...
![]()
@femurov I desperately wanted to post in the Broncos "Elway" thread but didn't out of respect to you.
I wanted to say, "I came here thinking this was a thread about the most overrated QB of all time"...
![]()
Less than 24 players now...So we are sticking with the 8 per decade?
I think 09, 49, 79 would have been better, there were some great 40's players out because of the warGeez 1944 sucks balls
So, should I change it again?