- Thread starter
- #41
If you're going to change it, make it 84. I've already made a list and it's alot easier to add 84's than go back and look up who all was exactly 83. Or leave it 83These years keep Ruth and the steroid players out. We have used 83 before, it was the stealing draft, just for you I am going to change it.
You didn't have to change it. I was just wondering...These years keep Ruth and the steroid players out. We have used 83 before, it was the stealing draft, just for you I am going to change it.
If you're going to change it, make it 84. I've already made a list and it's alot easier to add 84's than go back and look up who all was exactly 83. Or leave it 83
Well, of course it was great thinking. I was just pointing out that I wasn't complaining about the old years. I was just curious as to why you picked the years you had listed.No, i'm serious that was great thinking and you are right we have used 83. I love the new years...
Well, of course it was great thinking. I was just pointing out that I wasn't complaining about the old years. I was just curious as to why you picked the years you had listed.
You said that.The reason was to keep out Ruth, Bonds and Clemens...
Oh... why didn't you just say that? Always pussy-footing around an honest question...Ruth, Bonds & Clemens...
I have done more research for this NBA draft than every previous draft combined lolllll
Nice job doing the impossible, just when I thought the years couldn't suck any worse...Oh... why didn't you just say that? Always pussy-footing around an honest question...
I fucking knew that you created that NBA draft just for that reason lol![]()