- Thread starter
- #1
jstewismybastardson
Lord Shitlord aka El cibernauta
bobmacs twitter
It doesn't surprise me, but I think that Kunitz's move was far more deliberate and dangerous.
It doesn't surprise me, but I think that Kunitz's move was far more deliberate and dangerous.
They really do put more weight on history than needed. Basically this says the plays were equally offensive...which they weren't. At all. I was fully expecting 2 at the least.
To sum up the general opinion, it seems like the wrong decision... and nobody here is surprised.
I'm reserving judgement until I hear Mario's comments on the Kunitz hit...
True. Though I'm glad everyone is NOT freaking out and crying conspiracy.
Edit for NOT.
But what a stupid ass thing to do, i guess Cooke is rubbing off on him.
Isn't Tangradi close to coming back?? Might he be taking Kunitz's spot for that game.
Oh the irony!!!!
lol, i will dredge up my old joke again, Kunitz shouldn't have got anything cause Recchi said Gagne was faking...
Seriously, i expected at least 2 for Kunitz. Fot the sake of the Pens glad he got only 1. But what a stupid ass thing to do, i guess Cooke is rubbing off on him.