- Thread starter
- #1
Buffalo_Nickel_1
Well-Known Member
Redskins with the first pick select qb watson
He cant be any worse than Cousins
Shark! I sat there and watched Dak Prescott miss only seven passes for the whole game. Norman was responsible for three of those incompletions. The thought that Jerry coulda hit on a young QB that we'll face for years to come, makes me sick to my stomach.
Dak Prescott had two things we didnt....
1. A running game to keep our defense honest
2. An OC who was calling plays to protect him instead of trying to make Dak win the game all on his own.
Add a superior OLine to that as well. Again, if this team had an above average DL and OL, we would compete.
Dak Prescott had two things we didnt....
1. A running game to keep our defense honest
2. An OC who was calling plays to protect him instead of trying to make Dak win the game all on his own.
Then maybe we should focus on a new center and some really good d-line. Along with a new Defensive Coordinator. I think it would go along ways towards this team getting better. And we knew all along it would take 3-4 years of good drafting to right the ship and get better depth.
Although I don't see how you can pay Kirk Cousins a big contract or franchise him again unless he suddenly becomes Tom Brady for the rest of the season.
Then maybe we should focus on a new center and some really good d-line. Along with a new Defensive Coordinator. I think it would go along ways towards this team getting better. And we knew all along it would take 3-4 years of good drafting to right the ship and get better depth.
Although I don't see how you can pay Kirk Cousins a big contract or franchise him again unless he suddenly becomes Tom Brady for the rest of the season.
And that is the real issue here. You cant expect to throw a guy out there and have him be responsible for 75% of the offense, give him a bad defense, and what is currently the worst running game in the NFL... then be pissed when he isnt the second coming of Brady. When in the history of the NFL has a team ever been good with a 3-1 Pass to run ratio....
The play calling on the last Redzone drive says it all. 1 down, pass. 2nd down pass. 3rd Down we go five wide and try to pass. Now yes it was a dumb mistake for Kirk to try and force that ball into Garcon with Dallas dropping eight into coverage. I agree Kirk could and should have played better, but coaching, play calling and the defense could have been alot better as well.
Nobody is denying that the defense and play calling isn't also at fault. And I know that I am certainly not expecting Cousins to be Brady or Rodgers. Just asking him to step it up a bit. Perhaps they will run the ball more in the next few weeks. You seem to think that their running game is awful. Don't necessarily agree. I think that they need to run it a bit more & perhaps throw in some more short passes. Time will tell.
The coaching staff also seems to think the running game is awful. Or at least calling three pass plays from the six yard line would make one think that. I mean seriously... what other explanation can there be for a 3 to 1 pass to run ratio?? I get week one, when we were down by a ton of points. But from the six yard line, with a three point lead.. and we dont even consider trying to run the ball??
Look at it this way, instead of going five wide on that 3rd down where Kirk throws the pick, say we had run it. At worst we end up getting no yards, kick the field goal and we are up by six. And more importantly, we avoid putting Kirk in a position to make a soul crushing mistake which we telegraphed for the entire world to see by lining up five wide on 3rd and goal.
Dak Prescott had two things we didnt....
1. A running game to keep our defense honest
2. An OC who was calling plays to protect him instead of trying to make Dak win the game all on his own.