SlinkyRedfoot
Well-Known Member
If it does not translate into 15 wins....everyone can blame Ausmus and Mike Aviles.
I'd blame Little Ceasars. That pizza sucks ass.
If it does not translate into 15 wins....everyone can blame Ausmus and Mike Aviles.
All I'm saying is, he's had 5 full seasons in the bigs, and his worst ERA prior to last year's 3.66 was 3.25. He's also had two seasons under 3.00.
You no like warm crackers with cheese?I'd blame Little Ceasars. That pizza sucks ass.
Howard: It's not fair to just look at last year.
Slinkton: Yeah, but... <scratches head>
I'd blame Little Ceasars. That pizza sucks ass.
Makes no sense for anyone to dislike having the lineup posted hours before game time. None.I agree. My life is too busy (most days), and I look to The Hoop for some intelligent conversation and news. The line up is better than some of the dribble posted on here.
Did anyone go and check out the site that Vice brought up yesterday....faggottrolls.com? I'd never heard of it before he brought it up. I wish he had given us some info on it, as he seemed to be familiar with it. I wonder if it is a sports only site? I imagine Vice is an administrator at that site.
Here are my completely unscientific, Tiger-homer-hopeful projections for the starters.
Verlander = 215 IP, 77 ER, 3.22 ERA
Zimmermann = 195 IP, 78 ER, 3.60 ERA
Sanchez = 160 IP, 72 ER, 4.05 ERA
Pelfrey = 170 IP, 87 ER, 4.60 ERA
Boyd/Greene/Norris = 200 IP, 106 ER, 4.77 ERA*
*Should be lower if Norris gets the bulk of the starts from this group.
Comes out to 420 runs in 940 IP, for a composite ERA of 4.02. I can live with that.
Here are my completely unscientific, Tiger-homer-hopeful projections for the starters.
Verlander = 215 IP, 77 ER, 3.22 ERA
Zimmermann = 195 IP, 78 ER, 3.60 ERA
Sanchez = 160 IP, 72 ER, 4.05 ERA
Pelfrey = 170 IP, 87 ER, 4.60 ERA
Boyd/Greene/Norris = 200 IP, 106 ER, 4.77 ERA*
*Should be lower if Norris gets the bulk of the starts from this group.
Comes out to 420 runs in 940 IP, for a composite ERA of 4.02. I can live with that.
JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 131 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 131 IP - 5.50 ERA
Total - 942 IP - 4.16 ERA
I think boyd and greene could easily out perform that.
I would not use the word "easily" in this case.
Boyd and Greene have combined for about 220 ML innings with a 5.94 ERA. It's possible that things start to click for them both in 2016 and they combine for a 4.77 ERA or better, but to say they could "easily out perform that" takes some seriously blue and orange-colored glasses.
Not terribly different from my post-Norris-back-dealio numbers.
shane greene started 14 games in 2014 and had an era of 3.78. it really isn't that far fetched that he bounces back and has a respectable season.. he was injured last year... its not like he just had a shit year for no reason.I would not use the word "easily" in this case.
Boyd and Greene have combined for about 220 ML innings with a 5.94 ERA. It's possible that things start to click for them both in 2016 and they combine for a 4.77 ERA or better, but to say they could "easily out perform that" takes some seriously blue and orange-colored glasses.
boyd's minor league numbers are on par with top end prospects. his stats across all the minor league levels including the upper minors show a much better pitcher than what he showed last year.
shane greene started 14 games in 2014 and had an era of 3.78. it really isn't that far fetched that he bounces back and has a respectable season.. he was injured last year... its not like he just had a shit year for no reason.
I'm not from Missouri, but I guess I say, "Show Me." Boyd hasn't demonstrated the ability to get MLB hitters out consistently YET. Doesn't mean he won't.