• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Detroit Tigers Ongoing 2016 Thread

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Here's what I think is a decent breakdown of the Tigers rotation heading into 2016.

The Tigers had, by a reasonable margin, the worst starting rotation in 2015. About 30% of their starters' innings came from Price and Verlander, who pitched 279.1 inn with a 2.93 ERA. Price is gone and has been replaced with Jordan Zimmerman and Verlander is presumably healthy.

The rest of their rotation combined for 662.2 inn with a 5.55 ERA. Nearly 90% of that was made up of starts from Simon, Sanchez, Greene, Lobstein, Boyd, and Norris. The changes for 2016 include swapping out Simon for Pelfrey and expecting more innings from Norris.

Can a Zimmerman/Verlander combo improve on what the Tigers got from Price/Verlander in 2015? The innings shouldn't be a problem, but I'm not sure that 2.93 ERA is within reach. Moving to the AL, I'm thinking Zimmerman will be just short of 200 IP with an ERA bump for switching leagues - lets say 190 IP with a 3.80 ERA. If Verlander is healthy (and the reports are that he is), I could see him getting 200 IP, but the ERA is tough to guess. 6.62 in his first six starts of 2015 and 2.27 in the 14 subsequent starts. If he ups his innings to 200, I think he'll be somewhere between those, and likely closer to the latter than the former. Lets say 200 IP with a 3.50 ERA.

That would give them 390 IP with a 3.65 ERA. Assuming their going to match their total starters innings of 942(which was basically the league average), the rest of the starters would have to offer more than 552 IP with a 5.58 in order to improve on their 2015 rotation ERA of 4.78.

Frankly, I see no improvement in going from Simon to Pelfrey - it could end up being a step back. In 2015, Simon gave the Tigers 187 IP with a 5.05 ERA. Over the last three seasons, Pelfrey has carried a 4.94 ERA, but he did make some adjustments to his offerings last year that seemed to pay off and netted him a 4.26 ERA. I don't see any reason to think that he'll do significantly better or worse than his career mark of 4.52. So the ERA looks to be an improvement, but my question is the innings. Pelfrey has only pitched 187 innings once in the last five years and he's averaged only 111 IP per season over that time. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, let's put him at 140 IP with a 4.50 ERA.

So now we're at 530 IP with a 3.87 ERA, 412 IP to go, with Sanchez and Norris to go. Sanchez and his shoulder are a wild card. Presumably that shoulder caused a career 117 ERA+ pitcher to drop to an ERA+ of 79 in 2015. Will the shoulder allow him to improve his ERA, or increase his IP? I think yes and no. Let's say 150 IP at 3.99 ERA.

It's a safe bet to expect Norris will offer significantly more than the 36.2 IP he gave the Tigers in 2015. I've seen a few people reference possible innings limit on Norris, which I'm not sure I agree with. First, he pitched 150.2 in 2015 for Buffalo, Toronto and Detroit, so an IP increase of just 20% would get him to 180. Secondly, this is not a future ace that we're talking about, so I'm not sure why the Tigers would baby him and limit his innings thereby handing starts to Boyd and Greene. Maybe I'm crazy, but I think 175 IP is easily in reach for him, and I'm going with that. I do not think his ERA of 3.68 will hold up over those innings, though. Most reports I've read project him to be a borderline starter/reliever, and his ERA in the minors was 4.08. I think his ERA will be north of that across a full season as a starter in the majors. I'll go with 4.20 because it's higher than 4.08 and sometimes I smoke weed.

Those projections combine for 855 IP with a 3.97 ERA. That leaves about 90 innings for a Boyd/Greene combo. Those two combined for an ERA of 6.45 in 2015. I think, given Boyd's ceiling and Greene's artery surgery potentially helping his feel, they could certainly improve on that ERA, but how much is the question? It could be a whole lot, but until I see either produce at the major league level, I'm hesitant to go lower than 5.50.

JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 175 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 87 IP - 5.50 ERA

Total - 942 IP - 4.12 ERA

That's a 0.66 ERA improvement over 2015, which is significant, but still would likely put them at about league average. Of course, some of these guys could outperform my guesses here, but I don't see any reason to expect them to. On the other hand, should health prevent JV, AS or MP from reaching these innings, those IP will presumably go to MB/SG, which could drive the rotation's ERA up with a quickness.

If health is on their side, I think the Tigers could have an average rotation (which if their lineup stays healthy -- a whole other story -- should make them a contender). If injuries bite them, it could get ugly, though I doubt as ugly as 2015.
 

Iffster

Dude
7,305
526
113
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Good analysis, Mr. Redfoot. However, as it related to the last topic discussed (baseball related), it was a bit of an ''over-kill''. It appeared to me that the main thrust of Mr. Viceroy's topic was the fact that Starters #1.2. and 3 are "Good", while Starters #4 and 5 are "Not Good". He did stretch that revelation to include that often #4 and #5 are not as well known. However...the part of the topic you veered the farthest from was that Mr. Viceroy seemed to want to discuss the starting rotation of the 2014 SF Giants.

Nevertheless, thank you for your contribution and I am sure it will bring some interesting responses. Especially concerning niche topics such as Juan Uribe and Marlon Byrd, their age and worthlessness, etc.
 

Iffster

Dude
7,305
526
113
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Per
Here's what I think is a decent breakdown of the Tigers rotation heading into 2016.

The Tigers had, by a reasonable margin, the worst starting rotation in 2015. About 30% of their starters' innings came from Price and Verlander, who pitched 279.1 inn with a 2.93 ERA. Price is gone and has been replaced with Jordan Zimmerman and Verlander is presumably healthy.

The rest of their rotation combined for 662.2 inn with a 5.55 ERA. Nearly 90% of that was made up of starts from Simon, Sanchez, Greene, Lobstein, Boyd, and Norris. The changes for 2016 include swapping out Simon for Pelfrey and expecting more innings from Norris.

Can a Zimmerman/Verlander combo improve on what the Tigers got from Price/Verlander in 2015? The innings shouldn't be a problem, but I'm not sure that 2.93 ERA is within reach. Moving to the AL, I'm thinking Zimmerman will be just short of 200 IP with an ERA bump for switching leagues - lets say 190 IP with a 3.80 ERA. If Verlander is healthy (and the reports are that he is), I could see him getting 200 IP, but the ERA is tough to guess. 6.62 in his first six starts of 2015 and 2.27 in the 14 subsequent starts. If he ups his innings to 200, I think he'll be somewhere between those, and likely closer to the latter than the former. Lets say 200 IP with a 3.50 ERA.

That would give them 390 IP with a 3.65 ERA. Assuming their going to match their total starters innings of 942(which was basically the league average), the rest of the starters would have to offer more than 552 IP with a 5.58 in order to improve on their 2015 rotation ERA of 4.78.

Frankly, I see no improvement in going from Simon to Pelfrey - it could end up being a step back. In 2015, Simon gave the Tigers 187 IP with a 5.05 ERA. Over the last three seasons, Pelfrey has carried a 4.94 ERA, but he did make some adjustments to his offerings last year that seemed to pay off and netted him a 4.26 ERA. I don't see any reason to think that he'll do significantly better or worse than his career mark of 4.52. So the ERA looks to be an improvement, but my question is the innings. Pelfrey has only pitched 187 innings once in the last five years and he's averaged only 111 IP per season over that time. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, let's put him at 140 IP with a 4.50 ERA.

So now we're at 530 IP with a 3.87 ERA, 412 IP to go, with Sanchez and Norris to go. Sanchez and his shoulder are a wild card. Presumably that shoulder caused a career 117 ERA+ pitcher to drop to an ERA+ of 79 in 2015. Will the shoulder allow him to improve his ERA, or increase his IP? I think yes and no. Let's say 150 IP at 3.99 ERA.

It's a safe bet to expect Norris will offer significantly more than the 36.2 IP he gave the Tigers in 2015. I've seen a few people reference possible innings limit on Norris, which I'm not sure I agree with. First, he pitched 150.2 in 2015 for Buffalo, Toronto and Detroit, so an IP increase of just 20% would get him to 180. Secondly, this is not a future ace that we're talking about, so I'm not sure why the Tigers would baby him and limit his innings thereby handing starts to Boyd and Greene. Maybe I'm crazy, but I think 175 IP is easily in reach for him, and I'm going with that. I do not think his ERA of 3.68 will hold up over those innings, though. Most reports I've read project him to be a borderline starter/reliever, and his ERA in the minors was 4.08. I think his ERA will be north of that across a full season as a starter in the majors. I'll go with 4.20 because it's higher than 4.08 and sometimes I smoke weed.

Those projections combine for 855 IP with a 3.97 ERA. That leaves about 90 innings for a Boyd/Greene combo. Those two combined for an ERA of 6.45 in 2015. I think, given Boyd's ceiling and Greene's artery surgery potentially helping his feel, they could certainly improve on that ERA, but how much is the question? It could be a whole lot, but until I see either produce at the major league level, I'm hesitant to go lower than 5.50.

JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 175 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 87 IP - 5.50 ERA

Total - 942 IP - 4.12 ERA

That's a 0.66 ERA improvement over 2015, which is significant, but still would likely put them at about league average. Of course, some of these guys could outperform my guesses here, but I don't see any reason to expect them to. On the other hand, should health prevent JV, AS or MP from reaching these innings, those IP will presumably go to MB/SG, which could drive the rotation's ERA up with a quickness.

If health is on their side, I think the Tigers could have an average rotation (which if their lineup stays healthy -- a whole other story -- should make them a contender). If injuries bite them, it could get ugly, though I doubt as ugly as 2015.

Norris suffered a back injury and will likely not be available to start the season. Boyd or Greene will take over the 5th spot. As for your innings analysis of the rotation...my inclination would have been to put more emphasis on the possible (likely?) injury problems this rotation faces. Sanchez, Greene, Verlander and now Norris have all faced recent medical issues. With the ages of Sanchez and Verlander, the worry of re-occurrence is higher. At one point, Boyd and Greene were seen as rotation depth, but one will already be part of the rotation.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
However, as it related to the last topic discussed (baseball related), it was a bit of an ''over-kill''.

So now not only do my posts have to be baseball related, Tigers related, and not anti-Tigers, they have to be last-topic related.

Jesus H Christ in a canoe, Iffy! There's no pleasing you, is there?!
 

Iffster

Dude
7,305
526
113
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
So now not only do my posts have to be baseball related, Tigers related, and not anti-Tigers, they have to be last-topic related.

Jesus H Christ in a canoe, Iffy! There's no pleasing you, is there?!

LOL.....I am only a servant.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Per


Norris suffered a back injury and will likely not be available to start the season. Boyd or Greene will take over the 5th spot. As for your innings analysis of the rotation...my inclination would have been to put more emphasis on the possible (likely?) injury problems this rotation faces. Sanchez, Greene, Verlander and now Norris have all faced recent medical issues. With the ages of Sanchez and Verlander, the worry of re-occurrence is higher. At one point, Boyd and Greene were seen as rotation depth, but one will already be part of the rotation.

No doubt. I actually did the research, wrote and posted that analysis on the AL Central thread almost a full month ago. Norris' new back issue certainly gums it up.

I think the thrust of the article is that if everything turns out pretty well, the Tigers could have an average starting rotation. The fact that one of the guys who was not considered an injury risk is now considered an injury risk is a serious issue. It puts even more pressure on Verlander/Sanchez to produce.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Nevertheless, thank you for your contribution and I am sure it will bring some interesting responses. Especially concerning niche topics such as Juan Uribe and Marlon Byrd, their age and worthlessness, etc.

awkward-chuckle-psh-o.gif
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Norris suffered a back injury and will likely not be available to start the season. Boyd or Greene will take over the 5th spot. As for your innings analysis of the rotation...my inclination would have been to put more emphasis on the possible (likely?) injury problems this rotation faces. Sanchez, Greene, Verlander and now Norris have all faced recent medical issues. With the ages of Sanchez and Verlander, the worry of re-occurrence is higher. At one point, Boyd and Greene were seen as rotation depth, but one will already be part of the rotation.

Here's where the projection was:

JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 175 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 87 IP - 5.50 ERA

Total - 942 IP - 4.12 ERA

How many innings would you like to shift from Norris to Boyd & Green? According to some, Norris' innings were going to be limited anyway, so I felt I was being aggressive with the 175 because I didn't see the need to limit his innings. Maybe 20-30%? Let's go with 25%.

JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 131 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 131 IP - 5.50 ERA

Total - 942 IP - 4.16 ERA
 

Iffster

Dude
7,305
526
113
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Here's where the projection was:

JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 175 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 87 IP - 5.50 ERA

Total - 942 IP - 4.12 ERA

How many innings would you like to shift from Norris to Boyd & Green? According to some, Norris' innings were going to be limited anyway, so I felt I was being aggressive with the 175 because I didn't see the need to limit his innings. Maybe 20-30%? Let's go with 25%.

JZ/JV - 390 IP - 3.65 ERA
AS - 150 IP - 3.99 ERA
MP - 140 IP - 4.50 ERA
DN - 131 IP - 4.20 ERA
MB/SG - 131 IP - 5.50 ERA

Total - 942 IP - 4.16 ERA

I have been trying to find a report on Norris' back. The Tigers have only said that he will miss his next turn and will have some more test. My guess is this is something that will keep him out for awhile. Boyd and Greene have done fairly well this spring, so I doubt they will try and rush Norris back. Figure one of the other, or both pick up the April starts for the #5 starter.
 

Iffster

Dude
7,305
526
113
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You are aware that this thread is under constant surveillance by Miami Security Inc (The Jason's Deli Office)
 

Howie115

'Tis but a scratch...
4,674
1,091
173
Joined
May 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Norris is 22, and the Tigers would be stupid to rush him back, especially when you rarely need a #5 starter in April. That said, Ausmus was planning to hold off on starting Anibal Sanchez until April 11 because he hasn't put in many spring innings and needs to build up stamina.

So that first week of the season, which fortunately only has 5 games, looks like this:

April 5 - Verlander
April 6 - Zimmermann

April 8 - Pelfrey
April 9 - Greene/Boyd
April 10 - Verlander

Should Sanchez remain on target for a start on April 11, you then have:

April 12 - Zimmermann
April 13 - Pelfrey
April 14 - Norris, Boyd or Greene

If Norris isn't ready for April 14, the next time the Tigers need that spot to start is April 23. So they have some options to let Norris fully heal.
 

Howie115

'Tis but a scratch...
4,674
1,091
173
Joined
May 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
And no, I don't think Tiger fans are too thrilled about Mike Pelfrey starting the home opener vs. the Yankees. But it is what it is.
 

Howie115

'Tis but a scratch...
4,674
1,091
173
Joined
May 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Moving to the AL, I'm thinking Zimmerman will be just short of 200 IP with an ERA bump for switching leagues - lets say 190 IP with a 3.80 ERA.

So, we are taking Zimmermann's worst ERA in his five full seasons (3.66), and using that to compute his bump in the AL? I prefer to look at his career ERA (3.32) rather than just last season's. Also, I think the first couple times through the league, he'll do quite well. The teams that see him a second/third/fourth time may cause his ERA to climb. I'm looking for about a 3.50 ERA season for him, if you take his whole body of work into consideration and not just 2015.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
So, we are taking Zimmermann's worst ERA in his five full seasons (3.66), and using that to compute his bump in the AL? I prefer to look at his career ERA (3.32) rather than just last season's.

Fair point, Howard.

But I'd say that using career stats is as problematic as using the most recent year. His numbers in 2009 or 2010 aren't much of an indicator as to what he'll do in 2016. The MARCEL projection system is the simplest as well as most accurate out there. It takes a player's last three seasons' averages, weights the recent years more heavily, and adds some regression to the mean.

Zimmerman's ERA over the last three is 3.19. I'm not sure exactly how MARCEL weights the seasons, but I'm not sure it would matter because last year was as relatively "bad" as 2014 was great.

I think your suggestion of 3.50 is reasonable. When I get a chance, I'll update the rotations numbers.
 

Howie115

'Tis but a scratch...
4,674
1,091
173
Joined
May 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Zimm is 29, and one "down" year in five seasons is not unusual for a starter. To use only that one season, even if it's the most recent, I think is skewed. Just my opinion. If he was 34 or 35, I'd say the down season is a trend. But he's not.
 

Iffster

Dude
7,305
526
113
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Re: Zimmermann.

Getting a little too specific, gents. If Zimmermann finishes the season with a 3.80 ERA and 200 innings, AND that translates into 15 or 16 wins, I'd take that in a heartbeat. Figuring the addition of the DH adds a little to his stats and 200+ innings did its share to keep the bullpen fresh....I'd be pleased. Ditto with Verlander.

If it does not translate into 15 wins....everyone can blame Ausmus and Mike Aviles.
 

Howie115

'Tis but a scratch...
4,674
1,091
173
Joined
May 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Getting a little too specific, gents. If Zimmermann finishes the season with a 3.80 ERA and 200 innings, AND that translates into 15 or 16 wins, I'd take that in a heartbeat. Figuring the addition of the DH adds a little to his stats and 200+ innings did its share to keep the bullpen fresh....I'd be pleased. Ditto with Verlander.

I agree, it's splitting hairs. And I'd be pleased with 15 wins and 200 IP, too. All I'm saying is, he's had 5 full seasons in the bigs, and his worst ERA prior to last year's 3.66 was 3.25. He's also had two seasons under 3.00. I think it makes more sense to take his average season over those 5, and add in the AL factor from there.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,616
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Zimm is 29, and one "down" year in five seasons is not unusual for a starter. To use only that one season, even if it's the most recent, I think is skewed. Just my opinion. If he was 34 or 35, I'd say the down season is a trend. But he's not.

Did you think my response to you was disagreeing with you? I pretty much flat out agreed with you. If I was misunderstood, mea culpa, Howard.
 
Top