Pattersonca65
Well-Known Member
understatement of the night
I get ADHD with some of these threads. The back and forth between games about why the Cavs or Warriors will win, I get bored with it after awhile
understatement of the night
I get ADHD with some of these threads. The back and forth between games about why the Cavs or Warriors will win, I get bored with it after awhile
I get ADHD with some of these threads. The back and forth between games about why the Cavs or Warriors will win, I get bored with it after awhile
That's why we usually get off topic to kill time.
So, should James be faulted for losing any Finals but the Mavs?
So he'd be viewed by you as a better player if he had not had that amazing series to knock out the Pistons?
Maybe pass isn't the correct word, but nobody, not even the most optimistic Cavs fan felt they were the better team or should have beat the Spurs.
I think HOPE was about all they had.
Point is with the way Lebron has played through the first 4 games, even if they do lose he should not be blamed for this as he did his part. As turnup said the only finals which LBJ screwed up in was the Dallas finals.
I give guys a pass. Magic losing to the MJ bulls... pass. It was a damn miracle Magic got the team that far. I also think Kobe (and Shaq) losing to the Pistons is a bigger negative than LeBron losing to the Spurs in 2007. That series Kobe shot LA out of a finals by himself. Largely ignored his biggest mismatch on the court Shaq V Wallace. I parse things a little further down than most though. Don't get me wrong... Kobe is a top 10 player in my book for sure. Probably around 6-8 or so. I view the final 3 finals of Kobes career far more impressive than the first 4. Although 3-1 > 2-1
I don't. I can pretty well guarantee you that Magic (and any other all time great) wouldn't want one either. As for Kobe and the series vs. Detroit. Shaq says the Lakers win if Malone doesn't get hurt. I don't agree, but it is what he said.
I think it keeps coming down to the word "pass".
I'll rephrase.
Whatever you do becomes part of your resume.
It counts. It will become part of the equation of how you are judged.
Nobody's saying 'count this, don't count that', etc. regardless of roster or injuries.
But, if one is being objective, they can't crucify a player for losing in something when most feel he over achieved to get his team there.
I get ADHD with some of these threads. The back and forth between games about why the Cavs or Warriors will win, I get bored with it after awhile
Again, not a matter of crucifying or blaming him. Just holding him to the same standard as everyone else. If the wishes of many come true and Lebron never wins another title, he will still be one of the best to ever play and without doubt, will be a top 10 all time player.
However, he will always fall short in comparison to the likes of MJ, Magic and Kareem and it will be mainly because of his finals record.
He'll fall short in some people's opinions and not in others.
It's already happening.
My opinion on Finals losses was never part of any all time ranking debate.
IMO, it's generational.
We're old enough to remember the games when you could actually play physical defense and it wasn't a foul.
If Jordan and the others you named played with today's rules, can you imagine the numbers they could have put up?
Even if you remove title losses from the equation, he still falls short in ring count.
On the bold, it would be scary what kind of numbers those guys would put up. Imagine MJ driving to the hoop knowing that if he got fouled like the Bad Boy Pistons used to foul him, they'd be kicked out of the game.
That's why we usually get off topic to kill time.
So, should James be faulted for losing any Finals but the Mavs?
Stay classy cavs fans
Sad thing is the clown Gilbert actually RT that garbage