Wrestlemania Spoiler-Don't click if you don't want to know

[jeffro151]

 

[OregonDucks]

I think everyone saw or predicted this coming....reigns is the new super Cena. He will win title as well.

 

[Mistaken4193]

Yea Reigns is the next Cena. Sting vs HHH is going to be badass though. Also heard Cena vs Rusev and DB vs. Heel Sheamus.

 

[Judge Fudge]

Heard Wyatt's push right now is for............................


WYATT VS TAKER AT WM 31

 

[anotheridiot]

so are we looking at rollins not cashing in until wrestlemania, or do you think Brock gets a rematch and wins his belt back? I think best case is Rollins cashes in and loses. I am tired of that damned briefcase.

 

[jeffro151]

so are we looking at rollins not cashing in until wrestlemania, or do you think Brock gets a rematch and wins his belt back? I think best case is Rollins cashes in and loses. I am tired of that damned briefcase.

I think Brock manages to win @ RR, Rollins tries to cash in, then Orton makes the save before he can get the pin, which sets up Orton vs Rollins at WM.

 

[johnson]

It would be cool if Rollins won the briefcase again and could come down the ring with two briefcases.

Reigns v. Lesnar isn't that interesting (yet). They have no feud, no history, and there is not a good storyline behind it.

 

[{+}Mother-Marge{+}]

.........Wrestling is ~fake~....!?,............NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO......?!!

 

[wildturkey]

I'll pay to see the confused look on Vince's mug when he sees Brock is the one getting the babyface reaction for that match/build up.

 

[Duffman]

Rollins has until July so he can wait until after WM to cash in. And since I'd bet Brock isn't coming back Reigns winning the Rumble and then the WHC is very likely.

But I'd love to see Brock vs Daniel Bryan at WM.

 

[anotheridiot]

I'll pay to see the confused look on Vince's mug when he sees Brock is the one getting the babyface reaction for that match/build up.

I dont know, I think Vince would love to have Brock back again. I still think his UFC threats are just money still. If he got 5 million to show up less than a dozen times per year, its almost like the TNA guys with WCW that had guaranteed contracts to sit and watch and get paid. Brock was 5-3 in UFC, was embarassed there too. This recent turn of events might hold a longer future than we all expect.

 

[UK Cowboy]

Rollins has until July so he can wait until after WM to cash in. And since I'd bet Brock isn't coming back Reigns winning the Rumble and then the WHC is very likely.

But I'd love to see Brock vs Daniel Bryan at WM.

Brock vs Bryan at WM is a no brainer main event. Heel Cena vs Reigns would be the perfect way to really build up Reigns to take on Brock next year. HHH-Sting and Orton vs Rollins would be great as well. Reigns-Brock right now?

 

[Ewa PGH Fan]

.........Wrestling is ~fake~....!?,............NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO......?!!

What's you're point, Mother?


And not to nitpick but wrestling is pre-determined not fake. Oh, and based on NE's latest scandle (Low Ballgate) the same could now be said about all of NE's wins since 2000 or so, not just SB.

 

[3 & 6 years to go...]

Wow, is that billboard real? If it is, I cannot believe that anybody would let that get out there, this soon. I mean many of us have an idea of what is going to happen, but for the WWE to let this happen is strange.

 

[RobBase]

I think it's fake cause his tatted arm is on the wrong side. Pretty big fuck up if real.

 

[Godstree]

Yea Reigns is the next Cena. Sting vs HHH is going to be badass though. Also heard Cena vs Rusev and DB vs. Heel Sheamus.

I haven't really watched wrestling in years, like 20 or something like that. These two peaked back then. How can they be relevant today? Is there no one new?

 

[Mistaken4193]

I haven't really watched wrestling in years, like 20 or something like that. These two peaked back then. How can they be relevant today? Is there no one new?

WWE got into a mindset of developing 1 mega-superstar instead of developing a bunch of regular stars and it has really hurt the product and talent on the roster.

 

[Godstree]

WWE got into a mindset of developing 1 mega-superstar instead of developing a bunch of regular stars and it has really hurt the product and talent on the roster.

That seems like a bad idea. All the guys listed seem to have been around forever. All the new guys that I have seen, like the pale red head dude, just doesn't seem to interest me like Undertaker, Stone Cold, The Rock and guys like that did.

 

[Mistaken4193]

That seems like a bad idea. All the guys listed seem to have been around forever. All the new guys that I have seen, like the pale red head dude, just doesn't seem to interest me like Undertaker, Stone Cold, The Rock and guys like that did.

Yea, instead of developing a bunch of stars and letting one naturally breakout into superstardom on their own by crowd reaction, WWE handpicks the 1 guy they want and just worries about making him a star.

 

[3 & 6 years to go...]

WWE got into a mindset of developing 1 mega-superstar instead of developing a bunch of regular stars and it has really hurt the product and talent on the roster.

I think NXT has something to say about that.