- Thread starter
- #1
5% isn't bad, considering they could sell the shit pretty easily without help.
Stupid article...
Its like, someone uses their notoriety to bring attention to breast cancer and makes a donation and brings attention to the issue which must cause people to donate on their own.
But this person is complaining? Even if the league does make money of it, they still allow their limelight to be shared by breast cancer awareness and they still donate a large amount directly to breast cancer research... so if you ask me, this article is fucking stupid. Would it be better if they did nothing? Because that is an option too.
I hate the pink on the field. To distracting and not professional.
except most of that money is spent on bloated salaries and fund raisers to raise more money. Breast cancer is one giant fucking cash cow and people are so willing to just jump on board. NFL, Vodka, dog leashes, furniture, etc. Nobody is missing out on using breast cancer as a platform for an ad campaign.
Someone said should they just do nothing, well maybe. When you consider that most of the money is used to pay somebody or something that has nothing to do with helping those with breast cancer. and every Oct.people spend millions so they can get "stuff" thinking their helping someone, when in reality, they're just buying stuff and more people continue to make more money.
The billions and billions and billions raised every year for decades now and the best they can come up with is get your breasts shot up with ionizing radiation to look for tumors or get a genetic test and go cut your boobs off. They made a minimal impact in mortality because they find it in younger women and treat them. Whoo hooo! it's a statistical mill. can't say that in public though, especially if your a man, who can talk against breast cancer? It's too easy to marginalize those that do, so they don't.
But it's for breast cancer![]()
I'm more interested in seeing if the NFL can come up with catchy campaign for colon cancer.
Cleveland already has.
Hell they are the Browns even.
So the 5.4 million dollars that NFL donated to the American Cancer Society is a waste? And their campaign to promote early detection and regular exams with their "Crucial Catch" program is a waste of time?
NFL Pink - A Crucial Catch - NFL.com
I am sorry, but I just don't see it. The complaining is unjustified.
This argument that because not every dime gets to the cancer research so the 5.5 million the NFL directly donates is worthless is a bad argument. But thats not even nearly as important as their campaign to highlight early detection success stories to promote regular check ups.
lol... but you bring up a good point.
Wouldn't the NFL's efforts be better served by bringing awareness to men's health issues. Just saying as men are more than likely to die from cancer or related diseases and less likely to go and get cancer prevention screenings.