See that's the problem with American sports fans...it's all about scoring scoring scoring. If Felix is in a 0-0 or 1-1 pitching duel with let's say Justin Verlander...is that boring because there's not alot of scoring? If the Seahawks were in a defensive battle where the score was 3-0 or 6-3 against a tough 49ers team...would that be boring?
Don't mistaken soccer's lack of scoring for lack of action or excitement. 0-0 games or 1-1 games are usually some of the most intense games, because at any moment with one defensive mistake, one great header, or a great lob that drops in and it could result in a goal that seals the game.
It's very similar to an intense pitcher's duel where one bad pitch or one great swing could result in a hr that seals the game.
Nothing matches the intensity of the game of football but to say that soccer is boring is just wrong. It's nonstop action where there are no stops in play and most importantly no commercial breaks. Have you ever watched an nba game and in the final 20 seconds there's like 5 commercial breaks lol
It is not about the scoring so much as it is about the fact that the game can end in a tie (and routinely does). I have no interest in wasting time watching a game to have it end in a tie. I want to see a winner and a loser. That is the difference between soccer and baseball, one will eventually have a winner and one will just end pathetically, having accomplished nothing.
I like baseball, so it is not boring to me, but I know that it is a boring game to many. Soccer is the same way and no where near "non-stop action," it is just endless jogging back and forth until someone finally "hits a homerun." Again, the difference is that baseball will have a winner eventually.
The "excitement" in soccer is ruined quite often by flopping, which is worse than it was in basketball. And no, I don't watch basketball, it is worse than soccer to me, but then again, at least basketball will have a winner so maybe it isn't that bad?