Smack talk thread.

[darken65]

The one constant with all of your posts...you outwardly show a ton of sexual frustration. Whether it be discussing banging sheep, BJs, etc. Time to watch less game film, get out of mom's basement, and actually talk to a real girl....or boy, whatever tickles your pickle...you can do it Junior, just start by saying hi.

Fortunately for you, SportsHoopla provides all the sexual frustration emojis you need to get you through the dark times, huh?

He sure loves those banging sheep and BJs ones....prison thing?

 

[Uhsplit]

Here's some smack talk for you boys.
You aren't going up against the softies from the NFCN this week.
You get a chance at redemption against the #1 D in the NFL, you know, the team that held you to 26 points total in our 2 games played last year.
It's Smackdown Seahawk Style vs DouschbagHarbaughstyle.
You daisy's will witness a confirmation that we are the best team in the NFCW. It is merely the 1st game of a sweep this year for us over our little sister team to the south.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Here's some smack talk for you boys.
You aren't going up against the softies from the NFCN this week.
You get a chance at redemption against the #1 D in the NFL, you know, the team that held you to 26 points total in our 2 games played last year.
It's Smackdown Seahawk Style vs DouschbagHarbaughstyle.
You daisy's will witness a confirmation that we are the best team in the NFCW. It is merely the 1st game of a sweep this year for us over our little sister team to the south.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

With all due respect, Nick Saban won a National Title in college and sucked dog shit in the NFL so winning a major title on one level doesn't automatically make you a good coach. I don't know what you are insinuating but you don't necessarily have to be at the pinnacle every year to be considered a good coach. Everywhere Harbaugh has been, the program has gotten significantly better. In two years, he turned a team with a losing record into NFC Championship game participants both times, earning a Super Bowl appearance in year two. It doesn't get much better then that short of winning it all.

We put Harbaugh on no bigger pedestal then Hawks put Carroll. There is a ton of knob-slobbering when PC does something you Hawk fans deem great. The shit goes both ways.

The thing is, it's your buddies that like to come over here and spew all this shit of how great Harbs is. If your going to use the term "he pisses excellence", he better have at least won 1 SB. My point is he's a good coach, not great. If he wins a SB, then yes I will acknowledge that he is a great coach.

 

[dredinis21]

The thing is, it's your buddies that like to come over here and spew all this shit of how great Harbs is. If your going to use the term "he pisses excellence", he better have at least won 1 SB. My point is he's a good coach, not great. If he wins a SB, then yes I will acknowledge that he is a great coach.

You couldn't see the hyperbole in a statement "he pisses excellence" then huh? Everything is literal? I do think he is a great coach. If he wins a SB or two, he becomes a HOF coach. You cannot dispute a 27-7 record over with a winning playoff record, two Conference Championship appearances, and a Super Bowl appearance in two seasons, his only two seasons in the NFL as anything other then a GREAT start.

 

[Uhsplit]

You couldn't see the hyperbole in a statement "he pisses excellence" then huh? Everything is literal? I do think he is a great coach. If he wins a SB or two, he becomes a HOF coach. You cannot dispute a 27-7 record over with a winning playoff record, two Conference Championship appearances, and a Super Bowl appearance in two seasons, his only two seasons in the NFL as anything other then a GREAT start.

No doubt dred, but this is a funny business. If we sweep SF this year and go farther who would be considered a better coach, Pete or Harbs?

 

[SeattleOspreys]

You couldn't see the hyperbole in a statement "he pisses excellence" then huh? Everything is literal? I do think he is a great coach. If he wins a SB or two, he becomes a HOF coach. You cannot dispute a 27-7 record over with a winning playoff record, two Conference Championship appearances, and a Super Bowl appearance in two seasons, his only two seasons in the NFL as anything other then a GREAT start.

The hypocrisy of you using hyperbole.

You should capitalize great START because great is capitalized when he finishes the deal. He's a good
coach, big deal.

Do you deny that you're a sensitive homer that spends an inordinate amount of time on your rivals board vs your own? I will give you a clue. Y E ? Can you spell yes if I spot you the Y and E ?

 

[Rvnight18]

The thing is, it's your buddies that like to come over here and spew all this shit of how great Harbs is. If your going to use the term "he pisses excellence", he better have at least won 1 SB. My point is he's a good coach, not great. If he wins a SB, then yes I will acknowledge that he is a great coach.

Is pete a good or great coach?

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

You couldn't see the hyperbole in a statement "he pisses excellence" then huh? Everything is literal? I do think he is a great coach. If he wins a SB or two, he becomes a HOF coach. You cannot dispute a 27-7 record over with a winning playoff record, two Conference Championship appearances, and a Super Bowl appearance in two seasons, his only two seasons in the NFL as anything other then a GREAT start.

It's a good start to his career, not great. You guys insist on throwing his record at us, talk about building up the U of SD and Stanford but the lack of a Super Bowl victory or winning a National Title is what keeps us far apart on how we view Harbs. Greatness is Bill Walsh. Great is Mike Shannahan, Mike Tomlin or Tom Coughlin. Harbs is nowhere near these coaches.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

Is pete a good or great coach?

He's a good coach. I'll go even one further for you RV. By the end of Pete's tenure with the Seahawks, if he has a bunch of division titles and a few conference titles and no Super Bowl victories with a talented team and a stud franchise QB then I would consider it a failure in my eyes. It's all about the Championship.

 

[Rvnight18]

This is what Pete's third stint as HC in the NFL? Harbs has already done more in just two years. Don't understand how people question him as a coach or say Pete is better. Just look at history and results.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

This is what Pete's third stint as HC in the NFL? Harbs has already done more in just two years. Don't understand how people question him as a coach or say Pete is better. Just look at history and results.

How many times do you need it explained. Harbaugh started out with much better talent. He didn't have to turn the entire roster over, really this has been gone over so many times....time to move on.

 

[seahawksfan234]

This is what Pete's third stint as HC in the NFL? Harbs has already done more in just two years. Don't understand how people question him as a coach or say Pete is better. Just look at history and results.

During his first year as head coach when he went 6-10 with the Jets, he had zero head coaching experience at any level and was 43 years old. He made the playoffs 2 out of 3 years with the Patriots, which I wouldn't call a failure but did not really hit his stride until he started coaching at USC.

Before Harbaugh's first shot at the NFL with the 49ers, he had 7 years of head coaching experience. Pete Carroll had zero in his first NFL head coaching job.

Plus you also have to take into account the fact that when Pete Carroll took over the Seahawks we had a roster of mostly older veterans who were overpaid and past their prime, Jim Harbaugh on the other hand inherited most of the 49ers top players.

Harbaugh's career NFL accomplishments are greater than Carroll's, but Carroll was dealt a much worse hand than Harbaugh was. I'm not trying to say Harbaugh is a bad coach, I'm saying that he had inherited much better circumstances than Carroll did.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

This is what Pete's third stint as HC in the NFL? Harbs has already done more in just two years. Don't understand how people question him as a coach or say Pete is better. Just look at history and results.

Overall history in the NCAA

Pete Carroll- 1 National Title
Jim Harbaugh- 0 National Titles


Overall history in the NFL

Pete Carroll- 0 Super Bowl victories
Jim Harbaugh- 0 Super Bowl victories


It's you Niners fans that insist that Harbs is the better coach. Even with a National title under his belt, I still feel they are both on the same level. I don't know how much more I can explain this.

 

[NinerSickness]

Overall history in the NCAA

Pete Carroll- 1 National Title
Jim Harbaugh- 0 National Titles


Overall history in the NFL

Pete Carroll- 0 Super Bowl victories
Jim Harbaugh- 0 Super Bowl victories


It's you Niners fans that insist that Harbs is the better coach. Even with a National title under his belt, I still feel they are both on the same level. I don't know how much more I can explain this.

Actually, the NCAA stripped USC of its BCS title. So neither of them have one.

And notice how the NFL (who pays more) isn't constantly picking up BCS title winning coaches from NCAA. Winning in the NCAA isn't even remotely the same thing as winning in the NFL. They're not mutually exclusive of course, but there's no correlation between the two either.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

Actually, the NCAA stripped USC of its BCS title. So neither of them have one.

And notice how the NFL (who pays more) isn't constantly picking up BCS title winning coaches from NCAA. Winning in the NCAA isn't even remotely the same thing as winning in the NFL. They're not mutually exclusive of course, but there's no correlation between the two either.

USC stripped of its title is a whole different story for another time. Pete Carroll and 90 other USC players still won it that year. Since winning in the NCAA isn't even remotely the same as winning in the NFL, then please stop telling us how Harbs turned around the mighty U of SD and Stanford and held serve at both. If we want to judge on NFL only, then both are at 0 Super Bowl wins and are at the same level.

 

[dredinis21]

No doubt dred, but this is a funny business. If we sweep SF this year and go farther who would be considered a better coach, Pete or Harbs?

I didn't realize that this still a Harbs vs. Pete debate. I was simply defending Harbs' NFL resume when Hawk fans marginalize what he has done up to this point. If SEA sweeps SF this year, I don't think it sways anything really and vice versa. Both a great coaches. Both have great rosters. Both are in the top 3 in the NFL.

What I will say is this. Harbs instilled the system. Harbs changed the culture. Harbs gained the trust of his players. Harbs hired great assistant coaches. Hiding behind the whole "the roster was loaded with talent" bullshit is silly to me because other coaches tried and couldn't win more then 7 games in a season with the same crew. Harbs had ZERO off-season as that was the lock-out season and went 13-3 IIRC.

I'm not making a case of Harbs vs. Pete, I'm defending Harbs as a great coach with a great system that changed the entire culture of a team in a VERY minimal amount of time. Hawk fans love Pete. Niner fans love Harbaugh. Agree to disagree. But trying to discredit the jobs that either did is stupid.

 

[NinerSickness]

USC stripped of its title is a whole different story for another time. Pete Carroll and 90 other USC players still won it that year.

He still has zero BCS championships to his name. A tainted title that the NCAA took away is not the same thing as having a BCS Championship.

Since winning in the NCAA isn't even remotely the same as winning in the NFL, then please stop telling us how Harbs turned around the mighty U of SD and Stanford and held serve at both. If we want to judge on NFL only, then both are at 0 Super Bowl wins and are at the same level.

I never cited Harbaugh turning around those teams as the reason he's a great NFL head coach. I cited taking a losing team to the NFC Championship game & then the SB the following year as the reason he's a great NFL coach.

I'm fine with putting them both on the same "level" as you put it if that's how you want to define them. That doesn't mean I think all NFL coaches without a ring are equal. I give Jeff Fisher & Andy Reid more credit than I do Jason Garrett.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

He still has zero BCS championships to his name. A tainted title that the NCAA took away is not the same thing as having a BCS Championship.



I never cited Harbaugh turning around those teams as the reason he's a great NFL head coach. I cited taking a losing team to the NFC Championship game & then the SB the following year as the reason he's a great NFL coach.

I'm fine with putting them both on the same "level" as you put it if that's how you want to define them. That doesn't mean I think all NFL coaches without a ring are equal. I give Jeff Fisher & Andy Reid more credit than I do Jason Garrett.

Jeff Fisher is a good coach but Andy Reid is average at best. Jason Garrett doesn't have a shot at winning until that dope owner relinquishes his power. In fact neither of our coaches could have success in Dallas because of Jerry Jones.

We just have different views of what the terms good and great means with your coach.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I say things are getting out of hand here and I'm going to start deleting posts. Smack talk is for talking about football not personal smack talk attacks. In fact I'm going back and start deleting posts that include personal attacks.