BS Thread

[nuraman00]

Sometimes I'd be the ball boy because I liked to pass the ball,

Did you like to rebound?

Did you do the Malone swinging elbows after grabbing a rebound?

 

[MHSL82]

Doesn't a trainer need some kind of medical background? Do you have a medical background?

I was in the student athletic program. I also had a Medical Assisting license from a vocational program in high school. I worked in a hospital during the summers and weekends of the school year. So yeah, but if you wanted to be the waterboy, you could come, too. The waterboy did, too.

It was funny, the waterboy thought that it was the duty of both of us to bring the water, but he wanted to do it. He would hostilely try to take the job, though I never ever even touched the water. When I ignored it, he felt bad for me and offered to let me take it and I pretended that he earned it, told him how he'd do a better job and that the team needed his efficiency, and he was happy. No, the guy wasn't mentally challenged, just passionate. I'm not sure why he thought I was going to do it. I never did.

Did you like to rebound?

Did you do the Malone swinging elbows after grabbing a rebound?

Yes and no. I like to rebound, I like to shoot, and I love to pass. I always travel because I hate to dribble; it's a wasted use of energy. I never swung my elbows because I don't have any elbows. You know, like those people who don't have necks or ankles. I am not familiar with Malone's swinging elbows, Moses was a little before my time.

 

[Sackataters]

Glad you like it. One of the best you've had, maybe?

Here are the Ninkasi's I recommend:

* Believer Double Red
* Tricerahops
* Oatis Oatmeal Stout

Stay way from the Total Domination IPA, and the Radiant Ale.

Trying the Total Domination and it sure does suck. Bitter. Reminds me of the beer Jim Carey gave to the highway patrolman in Dumb and Dumber.

 

[nuraman00]

I was in the student athletic program. I also had a Medical Assisting license from a vocational program in high school.

So if there was a random gendered tennis player that needed some cream rubbed on that player's thighs, you would be licensed to do that, and the player wouldn't have to worry as much about a potential pervert, in you, pretending to be a trainer?

You can also use that magic spray, or clean up blood cuts, etc?

 

[nuraman00]

Trying the Total Domination and it sure does suck. Bitter. Reminds me of the beer Jim Carey gave to the highway patrolman in Dumb and Dumber.

LOL!

Interesting that we both liked the Tricerahops, and not the Total Domination.

I mean, two people don't have to have the same taste, but in both of these cases, we did.

 

[MHSL82]

So if there was a random gendered tennis player that needed some cream rubbed on that player's thighs, you would be licensed to do that, and the player wouldn't have to worry as much about a potential pervert, in you, pretending to be a trainer?

You can also use that magic spray, or clean up blood cuts, etc?

I was telling the attractive female athletes that they have to be tough, not pussies. So I applied some pu*** cream on the appropriate location. You might say that's dirty, but it's just medical. I mean, people touch shoulders all the time, so what's the big deal?

 

[nuraman00]

BTW I was asking a serious question about the thigh cream. Tennis players use it to control, prevent, or assuage cramps.

So would you be licensed to apply it?

I mean, sometimes a tournament has its own trainer, rather than allow personal trainers. So if you were the trainer for a tournament, and were on-call, could you do those types of random activities that they might ask for?

 

[MHSL82]

BTW I was asking a serious question about the thigh cream. Tennis players use it to control, prevent, or assuage cramps.

So would you be licensed to apply it?

I mean, sometimes a tournament has its own trainer, rather than allow personal trainers. So if you were the trainer for a tournament, and were on-call, could you do those types of random activities that they might ask for?

I never applied it on women, because I'm a homosexual. I never applied it on men because I'm homophobic.

Just kidding, they had female trainers, too. So they got the pleasure. Literally, they were non-homophobic lesbians.

Would it be homophobic to point out that I actually am straight? If so, then I'll let it stand as a joke. If not, I'd like to point out the joke by saying I'm straight with a wife, a baby, and another one on the way. Oh, and I hate gays. I mean, I love gays. I mean, it doesn't matter to me... as long as my kids aren't gay, I mean, as long as my wife's not gay. Kids are ok to be gay... but once they become adults? No way. Just kidding, there's nothing wrong with PC, I mean, nothing wrong with being gay, as long as you like women... in bed. Or men, either way. Being asexual or bisexual is cool, too. Well, not cool, just normal. Would hate for anyone to change their sexuality to be cool. But then again, to change it to be normal? Not needed either. Fine, being asexual or bisexual is acceptable. Straight or gay is acceptable, unless you're my wife and only straight is acceptable but threesomes with another woman or too is cool, but only I can be attracted to the other women and you, if you're my wife. We good everyone?

 

[MHSL82]

I know many are tired of this song, but after hearing it, I kept hearing "Yourgia" which sounds like "Georgia" so I went to see if there were any parodies of the song using "Georgia." Nope, but I did find this:


Pretty good as far as school music videos. For reference, here's the real music video:

 

[MHSL82]

One with cheerleaders...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQKrkTZIaQc#t=01m18s

Before this point, it's eh, IMO.

 

[MHSL82]

[YOUTUBE]s4xSUezj7_8&NR[/YOUTUBE]

 

[MHSL82]

"I wouldn't have called the technical if the ball didn't come down."
"Well, if I do this (acts out a slamming of the ball) it will come down."
Shrugs like he's saying, "exactly."

 

[MHSL82]

OT: On a message board a few years ago a guy said something ridiculous (I forgot what it was) and I responded that, "the bold is spot on" and there was no bolded part in the quote. The OP asked if I forgot to bold what he was talking about and I said, "No, the bolded part was well said and accurate." So the OP said, "you didn't bold anything." I said, "exactly."

I don't talk like that, but the guy was a jerk and an idiot. Moreso than I at both.

 

[MHSL82]

 

[Sackataters]

I accumulate sick and work days like a madman, only taking them if I'll lose them. Sick days and vacation days had their limits of when you had to use them. Sick days, I believe was shorter expiration date. They allowed it, but didn't like you adding them together, but I assume they didn't like time off altogether. It's harder for a company to adjust to two weeks, than one day, depending on your projects. They included it as an option because they knew it was a desired thing by employees.

I get 18 PTO (vac/sick) days per month. Plus, 8 holiday hours per month - as there are holidays I may have to work on. But, it is nice for taking long vacations...like out to Yellowstone and Utah. We are thinking Glacier NP this year. Plus, I work four 10s, so 3 day weekends is awesome. Working for the government (local) has some perks. Luckily, no sequestration (like Hill AF Base) either.

 

[MHSL82]

Pretty cool space saving. I have a house, not an apartment sized place, but this would be good for some who live downtown SF...

 

[MHSL82]

I was thinking that Corbin might do alright as his assistant.

Yeah, but he'd have a problem with only sending the older kids in or rotation issues on who could cross with who. It reminds me of the riddle where you need to get the wolf, the sheep, and the hay across the river but you can only take you and one other each trip. If you take the hay to avoid the sheep from eating the hay, the wolf eats the sheep. If you take the wolf, the sheep eats the hay. If you take the sheep, you're fucked. I don't know. I forgot about why you couldn't take the sheep first.

Oh, I remember. You take the sheep over to the other island and then go back and pick up the wolf. Then leaving the other island, you take back the sheep, drop him off at the first island. Take the hay to the other side. Drop that off, go back and get the sheep. Once you get there, the wolf eats you and the sheep before the sheep can get much hay. My answer was to let the sheep eat the hay and the wolf eat the sheep and then, if the wolf doesn't take a shit, all three technically made it across the river. My second answer was to put the wolf and hay in your right pocket and the wolf in your left.

 

[nuraman00]

Yeah, but he'd have a problem with only sending the older kids in or rotation issues on who could cross with who. It reminds me of the riddle where you need to get the wolf, the sheep, and the hay across the river but you can only take you and one other each trip. If you take the hay to avoid the sheep from eating the hay, the wolf eats the sheep. If you take the wolf, the sheep eats the hay. If you take the sheep, you're fucked. I don't know. I forgot about why you couldn't take the sheep first.

Oh, I remember. You take the sheep over to the other island and then go back and pick up the wolf. Then leaving the other island, you take back the sheep, drop him off at the first island. Take the hay to the other side. Drop that off, go back and get the sheep. Once you get there, the wolf eats you and the sheep before the sheep can get much hay. My answer was to let the sheep eat the hay and the wolf eat the sheep and then, if the wolf doesn't take a shit, all three technically made it across the river. My second answer was to put the wolf and hay in your right pocket and the wolf in your left.

1. Why wouldn't the wolf just eat you on the way over across the river? If the wolf is that dangerous, then why transport the wolf in the first place? Is the wolf smart enough to know she or he needs you to cross the river?

2. Your answer was:

A. Take sheep over.
B. Take wolf over, but bring sheep back to island 1.
C. Take hay over.
D. Take sheep over.


What about this slight alteration?

A. Take sheep over.
B. Take hay over, but bring sheep back to island 1
C. Take wolf over.
D. Take sheep over.

Does that have the same ending too, where the wolf eats the sheep, as the sheep eats the hay?



Here's a Lego version:

 

[MHSL82]

1. Why wouldn't the wolf just eat you on the way over across the river? If the wolf is that dangerous, then why transport the wolf in the first place? Is the wolf smart enough to know she or he needs you to cross the river?

2. Your answer was:

A. Take sheep over.
B. Take wolf over, but bring sheep back to island 1.
C. Take hay over.
D. Take sheep over.


What about this slight alteration?

A. Take sheep over.
B. Take hay over, but bring sheep back to island 1
C. Take wolf over.
D. Take sheep over.

Does that have the same ending too, where the wolf eats the sheep, as the sheep eats the hay?



Here's a Lego version:

If I were the wolf, I'd eat the hay just out of principle to show that you are not manipulating me with your logic and relying upon you assumptions that I won't eat the hay. Personally, he should have sent the wolf and the hay over, have the hay drive the boat back, and then take the sheep over, and have the wolf drive the boat back, and then have the sheep drive back empty handed, and you take the wolf over, and go back empty handed to grab the sheep.

 

[nuraman00]

If I were the wolf, I'd eat the hay just out of principle to show that you are not manipulating me with your logic and relying upon you assumptions that I won't eat the hay. Personally, he should have sent the wolf and the hay over, have the hay drive the boat back, and then take the sheep over, and have the wolf drive the boat back, and then have the sheep drive back empty handed, and you take the wolf over, and go back empty handed to grab the sheep.

You mean like attach the hay to the side of the boat, on the water?

But then the hay would get wet. A sheep wouldn't want to eat wet hay, you'd ruin the delicious taste of it for them.