Markieff, another clown joins the circus.

[buckalis]

does it matter, you will continue to call people harsh names and cuss

I guess anybody that takes out part of a comment in purpose in order to divert the meaning is a moron and a dickhead!

Simply because he does it on purpose... especially if out of an entire conversation that takes 3 different threads and more than a dozen of pages involved, he selects a single post and still crops out the parts that would lead to different conclusions.

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

No... it's your idea of fan... clipping parts out of a suggestion in order to make it look different than what it is in purpose, only proves you a moron if you ask me...

So what's your excuse for this then? It was your ENTIRE POST!!!

Paul George is the Bucks primary target for next season... (with high chances to get him).

 

[SteelersPride]

I guess anybody that takes out part of a comment in purpose in order to divert the meaning is a moron and a dickhead!

Simply because he does it on purpose... especially if out of an entire conversation that takes 3 different threads and more than a dozen of pages involved, he selects a single post and still crops out the parts that would lead to different conclusions.

R u drunk

 

[buckalis]

Your whole post was predicated on two things:

1) Middleton would sign a team friendly deal

or

2) Middleton would then be traded to another team.


NEITHER HAPPENED.

And on top of that your trade proposal did NOT include Middleton. It was centered around George Hill and Tony Snell which is plainly evident.

Good day, sir.

Again you alter things... I was saying before that Middleton would sign for 25M or he would have to be moved on a sign & trade, under the assumption that Brogdon would resign... (because the money wouldn't work otherwise).

As it turned out, Brogdon was moved on a sign and trade and the Bucks then could pay Middleton more and keep Hill on a team friendly at half his previous salary!

But you know all that already and you still deliberate hide them in order to alter the meaning...

Therefore... Good day moron dickhead!

Don't get too pride sensitive next time after one (me in this case) has explained to you why your team won't resign KD, will go under the tax and won't go over the tax next season either...

You shouldn't be so stubborn and get heartbroken after proved wrong in order to react like a moron! it doesn't cause you getting your pride back!

 

[CitySushi]

Again you alter things... I was saying before that Middleton would sign for 25M or he would have to be moved on a sign & trade, under the assumption that Brogdon would resign... (because the money wouldn't work otherwise).

As it turned out, Brogdon was moved on a sign and trade and the Bucks then could pay Middleton more and keep Hill on a team friendly at half his previous salary!

But you know all that already and you still deliberate hide them in order to alter the meaning...

Therefore... Good day moron dickhead!

Don't get too pride sensitive next time after one (me in this case) has explained to you why your team won't resign KD, will go under the tax and won't go over the tax next season either...

You shouldn't be so stubborn and get heartbroken after proved wrong in order to react like a moron! it doesn't cause you getting your pride back!

Just admit you were wrong and man up. Quit being such a whiny bitch about it.

Also KD left because he wanted to leave, not because the Warriors wouldn't pay him and pay a luxury tax. They offered him the contact and he declined. You human trash can.

 

[buckalis]

Just admit you were wrong and man up. Quit being such a whiny bitch about it.

I was wrong on what moron?

-That you deliberately cropped out me suggesting alternatives other than PG? why did you crop it out moron?
-that you deliberately cropped out the "if Middleton will be moved" part?
why did you crop it out moron?

Also KD left because he wanted to leave, not because the Warriors wouldn't pay him and pay a luxury tax. They offered him the contact and he declined. You human trash can.

Says who? you? KD didn't decline anything moron, he was moved on a sign & trade for Russell and vice versa!

 

[buckalis]

R u drunk

R U?

 

[trojanfan12]

nasty cincinnati chili.

Man, that is nasty too.

A couple of years ago, I got curious because I had heard a lot about "Cincinnati Chili" and had seen it on Diners, Drive Ins and Dives.

So I found the recipe from the restaurant that was featured on the show

Even put it on spaghetti noodles and covered it with a shitload of cheese like they do.

My taste buds still haven't forgiven me.

 

[CitySushi]

I was wrong on what moron?

Literally everything you hemorrhoid. You'd find more NBA knowledge in a dogs nutsack than in that brain of yours. You walking soiled band-aid.

 

[trojanfan12]

R u drunk

It's always Ouzo thirty somewhere.

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

I was wrong on what moron?

You do realize that you're wrong on about 99% of the things you say, right?

Heck, there's an entire thread on that.

 

[buckalis]

Literally everything you hemorrhoid. You'd find more NBA knowledge in a dogs nutsack than in that brain of yours. You walking soiled band-aid.

Cool... spot on subject again... just a troll with his pride been heart bad!

 

[trojanfan12]

Literally everything you hemorrhoid. You'd find more NBA knowledge in a dogs nutsack than in that brain of yours. You walking soiled band-aid.

LANGUAGE!!

 

[buckalis]

So what's your excuse for this then? It was your ENTIRE POST!!!

oohhh that! that's post no 92 ain't it?

Why not bringing up no 88 that is earlier too?

 

[logic]

LANGUAGE!!

EAR MUFFS!!!

 

[trojanfan12]

EAR MUFFS!!!

HEY!! We don't need any of your back sass around here...mister.

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

oohhh that! that's post no 92 ain't it?

Why not bringing up no 88 that is earlier too?

Maybe because post #88 had nothing to do with PG.

Post #92 was a singular statement.

 

[CitySushi]

Cool... spot on subject again... just a troll with his pride been heart bad!

I’ve quoted so many things in this thread that you have been wrong about.

You’re like someone who’s color blind trying to tell us what the sky looks like.

 

[buckalis]

Maybe because post #88 had nothing to do with PG.

Post #92 was a singular statement.

oh was it?

How about going back to No12 which clearly states my position in the "middleton replacement" conversation before all then?

it says there (in exact words):

"- Bojan Bogdanovic will be what the Bucks will be primarily after, if they are forced to let Middleton go due to disagreement on his contract renewal."

I guess you will now claim "the conversation started with a singular statement"... won't you?

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

oh was it?

How about going back to No12 which clearly states my position in the "middleton replacement" conversation before all then?

it says there (in exact words):

"- Bojan Bogdanovic will be what the Bucks will be primarily after, if they are forced to let Middleton go due to disagreement on his contract renewal."

I guess you will now claim "the conversation started with a singular statement"... won't you?

Find me a source that Paul George was a serious target for the Bucks.

Just one