Best two way player in game today. Jayson Tatum. Ceiling ?

[buckalis]

Yeah Buckalis, anyone can quote anyone's old posts. You just have to find it. It doesn't exist though.

I just found the thread where he claims me saying "OKC will blow it up" to be "ridiculus", me calls ignorant, mad, crazy, me telling him that they need to dump 20M of salaries, he insists "they'll do it without trading PG", "they won't take back Hill" "Hill won't take less sallary than the 19M he non-guaranteed contract had", "Divincenzo's value is as much as a low first"... he goes on for 8 pages... in the same thread, he goes on for another 4 pages "explaining" to me the CBA... "informing me" (me being ignorant) that the Lakers can trade Ingram directly for PG although with only 7 players in the roster and before July the 1st and many more other idiocies... "chorus" backing him is the same as always... "Shaq", "Chief", "Wamu" and.... you!

I've saved the link for later after I'll find the rest of his lies and trolling (brogdon being better than Khris, Brogdon being no2 etc... Will let you guys (I'm sure you remember the thread I'm talking about and the other threads too) expand your trolling the more you can and then bring it all to your face...

 

[tlance]

I just found the thread where he claims me saying "OKC will blow it up" to be "ridiculus", me calls ignorant, mad, crazy, me telling him that they need to dump 20M of salaries, he insists "they'll do it without trading PG", "they won't take back Hill" "Hill won't take less sallary than the 19M he non-guaranteed contract had", "Divincenzo's value is as much as a low first"... he goes on for 8 pages... in the same thread, he goes on for another 4 pages "explaining" to me the CBA... "informing me" (me being ignorant) that the Lakers can trade Ingram directly for PG although with only 7 players in the roster and before July the 1st and many more other idiocies... "chorus" backing him is the same as always... "Shaq", "Chief", "Wamu" and.... you!

I've saved the link for later after I'll find the rest of his lies and trolling (brogdon being better than Khris, Brogdon being no2 etc... Will let you guys (I'm sure you remember the thread I'm talking about and the other threads too) expand your trolling the more you can and then bring it all to your face...

I don’t deny any of that.

I was wrong about PG not being traded.

And yet, you were still far more wrong.

And again, OKC did not trade PG merely to get under the luxury tax accepting pennies on the dollar as you said they would. They traded him because he asked them to trade him. Had George wanted to stay in OKC, he would still be there playing with Russ. Then they probably would have blown it up this summer after it didn’t work.

 

[msgkings322]

He's one of the people that has to be right all the time and refuses to take any criticism, advice or opinions of anyone else.

It's not quite a mental illness but more of a feeling of self entitlement:
Everything he says is correct, the NBA team he roots for has no flaws of any kind and if things don't go his way he goes in to a little meltdown tantrum.

Look up some videos on youtube. Its full of people going ape-shit crazy when things don't go their way. Bucky is the type of person that shows up late for a flight and demands the airplane turns back to pick him up or "They'll call corporate".

I agree but it's more than that. If he's not playing around, he is crazy to think we will believe his obvious lies, and crazy to post so many angry cussing meltdowns. No one does this so much

 

[msgkings322]

I just found the thread where he claims me saying "OKC will blow it up" to be "ridiculus", me calls ignorant, mad, crazy, me telling him that they need to dump 20M of salaries, he insists "they'll do it without trading PG", "they won't take back Hill" "Hill won't take less sallary than the 19M he non-guaranteed contract had", "Divincenzo's value is as much as a low first"... he goes on for 8 pages... in the same thread, he goes on for another 4 pages "explaining" to me the CBA... "informing me" (me being ignorant) that the Lakers can trade Ingram directly for PG although with only 7 players in the roster and before July the 1st and many more other idiocies... "chorus" backing him is the same as always... "Shaq", "Chief", "Wamu" and.... you!

I've saved the link for later after I'll find the rest of his lies and trolling (brogdon being better than Khris, Brogdon being no2 etc... Will let you guys (I'm sure you remember the thread I'm talking about and the other threads too) expand your trolling the more you can and then bring it all to your face...

You could just post the link instead of typing it all out like this. I'm looking forward to seeing it.

 

[buckalis]

I don’t deny any of that.

I was wrong about PG not being traded.

And yet, you were still far more wrong.

And again, OKC did not trade PG merely to get under the luxury tax accepting pennies on the dollar as you said they would. They traded him because he asked them to trade him. Had George wanted to stay in OKC, he would still be there playing with Russ. Then they probably would have blown it up this summer after it didn’t work.

Go on... keep diverging things!

i say there "OKC will blow it up because they need to save 20M of salaries" and now you've divert it to "dump PG salary only"... now you claim "it was done because PG asked to be traded"... No! I've already explained to you there, that other than the tax, it's stupid to insist on an expensive team that goes nowhere!

That's why they blew it! Because it was ridiculously expensive and was going nowhere!

 

[buckalis]

You could just post the link instead of typing it all out like this. I'm looking forward to seeing it.

After I find all the threads I'm looking for... keep going in the mean time... you 5 are either multiple accounts or a "gang" in here!

I've already said that I will let you develop it as much as you can here and then "bring it all up to your face"...

 

[tlance]

Go on... keep diverging things!

i say there "OKC will blow it up because they need to save 20M of salaries" and now you've divert it to "dump PG salary only"... now you claim "it was done because PG asked to be traded"... No! I've already explained to you there, that other than the tax, it's stupid to insist on an expensive team that goes nowhere!

That's why they blew it! Because it was ridiculously expensive and was going nowhere!

It was ridiculously expensive and going nowhere. I agree with that.

But they also would have given PG and Russ 1 more year just 1 year removed from signing PG UNLESS PG wanted out. Which he did. And when PG wanted out, Russ was next.

And yet still, your PG to Bucks trade idea which started this entire back and forth was mind numbingly stupid and unrealistic. So despite the fact that I was wrong about PG staying in OKC 1 more year, you were even more wrong with your insane PG to Milwaukee trade idea.

And everyone here knows the truth.

 

[msgkings322]

After I find all the threads I'm looking for... keep going in the mean time... you 4 are either multiple accounts or a "gang" in here!

I've already said that I will let you develop it as much as you can here and then "bring it all to your face"...

We are definitely ganging up on you because you ask for it with every post. But there are no alt posters, each user is unique. No matter how many times you say otherwise, reality is what it is.

 

[tlance]

After I find all the threads I'm looking for... keep going in the mean time... you 4 are either multiple accounts or a "gang" in here!

I've already said that I will let you develop it as much as you can here and then "bring it all up to your face"...

Good luck.

Will you apologize and admit you were wrong when you can’t find those BS quotes?

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

I just found the thread where he claims me saying "OKC will blow it up" to be "ridiculus", me calls ignorant, mad, crazy, me telling him that they need to dump 20M of salaries, he insists "they'll do it without trading PG", "they won't take back Hill" "Hill won't take less sallary than the 19M he non-guaranteed contract had", "Divincenzo's value is as much as a low first"... he goes on for 8 pages... in the same thread, he goes on for another 4 pages "explaining" to me the CBA... "informing me" (me being ignorant) that the Lakers can trade Ingram directly for PG although with only 7 players in the roster and before July the 1st and many more other idiocies... "chorus" backing him is the same as always... "Shaq", "Chief", "Wamu" and.... you!

I've saved the link for later after I'll find the rest of his lies and trolling (brogdon being better than Khris, Brogdon being no2 etc... Will let you guys (I'm sure you remember the thread I'm talking about and the other threads too) expand your trolling the more you can and then bring it all to your face...

Actually, THIS is what you claimed @tlance said:

- Brogdon is better than Middleton.
- Brogdon was the Bucks No2 behind Giannis,
- The Bucks will be worst than last season.
- The Bucks will never make it to the ECF this season
- The Bucks won't win more than 55 this season.
- Snell would never start for the Pistons,
- A team with only 6 players under contract can trade a rookie contract for a max contract, because it's under the (soft) cap.
- A "rookie contract" in it's last season is a "cheap contract".
- A vast number of more idiocies...

You never said anything of the above... correct? You didn't even ever tried to "teach me" on the CBA... did you? (lol... that was the "best" part)

LOL... What a hypocrite you is (not "are" for you)! Fucking liar!

Now back those specific claims up.

 

[trojanfan12]

Ooooh...we got an e-gang in here.

 

[buckalis]

It was ridiculously expensive and going nowhere. I agree with that.

Oh... you agree now? ....after I found the thread?

Why didn't you agree at the original thread but kept going for 8 pages (along with the usual "chorus" that always backs you up) and was trying to bully me instead motherfucker?

Isn't it late to agree now in what you was disagreeing before?

What about the "PG for Snell" trade dickhead?

Why did you invented that and put it on me saying it?

why did you make that "suggest a Buck Alice trade" thread motherfucker?

fucking idiot! ignorant troll! Hypocrite Liar!

[/QUOTE]

 

[Black Adam]

Ooooh...we got an e-gang in here.

I was down wit' my crew from day one, dawg...

 

[tlance]

Oh... you agree now? ....after I found the thread?

Why didn't you agree at the original thread but kept going for 8 pages (along with the usual "chorus" that always backs you up) and was trying to bully me instead motherfucker?

Isn't it late to agree now in what you was disagreeing before?

What about the "PG for Snell" trade dickhead?

Why did you invented that and put it on me saying it?

why did you make that "suggest a Buck Alice trade" thread motherfucker?

fucking idiot! ignorant troll! Hypocrite Liar!

[/QUOTE]

So because I agree with a very small piece of your argument I have to agree with all your idiotic ramblings?

In that same conversation, you said PG was a realistic trade target for Milwaukee because OKC had to trade him and Milwaukee had 1 of the “2 most valuable contracts in basketball” with George Hill.

Well guess what genius?

The fact that Hill and JR Smith were not traded proves definitively that you were way off on that. Just like you were wrong about everything else in that conversation.

But good job clinging to the very small part you got correct there with PG getting dealt.

And I did not invent PG for Snell. People (maybe me, I can’t remember) said it jokingly make fun of your idiotic idea which was Snell, Hill and 1 or 2 more relatively minor pieces for PG. the “Snell for PG” comments were an obvious joke making fun of your ridiculous trade idea that you made in earnest.

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

What about the "PG for Snell" trade dickhead?

Why did you invented that and put it on me saying it?

Here it is:

But... If they trade Paul George for George Hill and Tony Snell in a "sign and trade" for Hill, then the contracts they take back save them some 16M (!!!) which is what they need to go below the Tax line and save the 60M they would otherwise have to pay... Now why do I see Paul George ending a Buck next season?

Now what? Deepshit!

 

[buckalis]

The fact that Hill and JR Smith were not traded proves definitively that you were way off on that. Just like you were wrong about everything else in that conversation.

[/QUOTE]

No! it only proves that OKC found an unexpected opportunity better than to dump an non guaranteed salary that would count on its previous season's value on a trade!

...and additionally, they have found a customer for Westbrook too (when "everybody" thought it was nearly impossible)...

It also proves that the Bucks were wise not to trade Hill but resign him on a smaller contract after Middleton extended with the Bucks... Wiser above all of course proved to be investing on Divincenzo instead of Brogdon!

I guess the looser was the Cavs, who decided not to take what was sensible (perhaps a low 1st pick?) for J.R. Smith, but instead overvalued him and payed him another 0.5M to extend his contract for another month in their desperate attempt to gain more...

 

[trojanfan12]

Here it is:



Now what? Deepshit!

 

[tlance]

The fact that Hill and JR Smith were not traded proves definitively that you were way off on that. Just like you were wrong about everything else in that conversation.

No! it only proves that OKC found an unexpected opportunity better than to dump an non guaranteed salary that would count on its previous season's value on a trade!

...and additionally, they have found a customer for Westbrook too (when "everybody" thought it was nearly impossible)...

It also proves that the Bucks were wise not to trade Hill but resign him on a smaller contract after Middleton extended with the Bucks... Wiser above all of course proved to be investing on Divincenzo instead of Brogdon!

I guess the looser was the Cavs, who decided not to take what was sensible (perhaps a low 1st pick?) for J.R. Smith, but instead overvalued him and payed him another 0.5M to extend his contract for another month in their desperate attempt to gain more...[/QUOTE]

You said that George Hill and JR Smith were the 2 most valuable contracts in the entire league.

Hill can still play a bit, but Smith is cooked.

If you were correct on that, Smith DEFINITELY would have been traded for an asset and Hill likely too.

You were very, very wrong.

 

[LogicMan]

Damn I opened up a fester. Like this thread makes the Iran hostage situation look tame

 

[Sparhawk]

Damn I opened up a fester. Like this thread makes the Iran hostage situation look tame

 

[LogicMan]

sometimes you got to just move on.