so non-AQ at large has to be conference champ?

[yeodonie]

yet we will allow a team that can't even with their own DIVISION to play for the NCG?

I don't get it.

 

[CrimsonFan]

 

[yeodonie]

You don't see a problem with that?

 

[potzer25]

BCSNCG is designed to make #1 and #2 ranked teams face each other - which rarely happened when conferences had bowl tie-ins that could not be broken. Everything else is really just window dressing. If #1 and #2 are in the same conference...so it goes.

How's this for a rule:

No more than two teams from a conference may be selected, regardless of whether they are automatic qualifiers or at-large selections, unless two non-champions from the same conference are ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in the final BCS Standings.

 

[CrimsonFan]

If it's the two best teams then no

 

[yeodonie]

how do we know they're the two best teams? I'd be very interested to go back and see your opinion on the matter when it was Michigan and tOSU who were ASSUMED to be the two best teams.

 

[metal_frk_334]

Nobody is going to be happy if LSU loses to Ark and Okie-Light loses to OU. At that point it really doesn't matter. Two teams will get lucky and the rest will be pouting.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

You tell me

 

[BoiseStateFan27]

how do we know they're the two best teams? I'd be very interested to go back and see your opinion on the matter when it was Michigan and tOSU who were ASSUMED to be the two best teams.

this

last time this rematch of two teams in a conference was considered it turned out that both Ohio State and Michigan weren't the best two teams

both were dominated

 

[boomtown]

cosign...ooc notwithstanding, how can you judge based off performance against the same conference

 

[metal_frk_334]

What exactly do those two teams have in common with Alabama and LSU? Wasn't their combined score in their game something like 79 points? You are comparing apples and oranges. The only thing that these four teams have in common is that they were both #1 and #2 when they played each other. That is all... There is nothing to point to that would indicate LSU and Alabama will get blown out in their bowl games.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

What exactly do those two teams have in common with Alabama and LSU? Wasn't their combined score in their game something like 79 points? You are comparing apples and oranges. The only thing that these four teams have in common is that they were both #1 and #2 when they played each other. That is all... There is nothing to point to that would indicate LSU and Alabama will get blown out in their bowl games.

No rematches i would rather see grapefruits than apples and oranges again

 

[bone3421]

What exactly do those two teams have in common with Alabama and LSU? Wasn't their combined score in their game something like 79 points? You are comparing apples and oranges. The only thing that these four teams have in common is that they were both #1 and #2 when they played each other. That is all... There is nothing to point to that would indicate LSU and Alabama will get blown out in their bowl games.

what can you point to that says lsu and bama wont get blown out in there bowl games after they sit around for 4 weeks? no one knows thats why you dont do rematches.......im sure you thought ya'll were going to beat utah,im sure OU thought they would beat boise st

 

[goDAWGSsicem]

so non-AQ at large has to be conference champ?

yet we will allow a team that can't even with their own DIVISION to play for the NCG?

I don't get it.

I don't think that is a requirement, BCS at-large pics can be aby team in the top14 in the BCS rankings.


There will not be a rematch of LSU/Bama.

 

[goDAWGSsicem]

what can you point to that says lsu and bama wont get blown out in there bowl games after they sit around for 4 weeks? no one knows thats why you dont do rematches.......im sure you thought ya'll were going to beat utah,im sure OU thought they would beat boise st

I think we could see Bama losing to Houston in the Sugar Bowl this year.

 

[metal_frk_334]

what can you point to that says lsu and bama wont get blown out in there bowl games after they sit around for 4 weeks? no one knows thats why you dont do rematches.......im sure you thought ya'll were going to beat utah,im sure OU thought they would beat boise st

I'd give a stout defensive team the edge over any high octane offense.

 

[The Crimson King]

You don't see a problem with that?

Template:2007 NFC East standings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2007 New England Patriots ? New York Giants game - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Super Bowl XLII - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[yeodonie]

I don't think that is a requirement, BCS at-large pics can be aby team in the top14 in the BCS rankings.


There will not be a rematch of LSU/Bama.

I wasn't aware that the at large team for a non AQ school in additional to having to be the highest ranked non AQ team must also be conf champ. That's apparently why BSU which will finish top 10 ahead of Houston won't go to BCS game.

In other words we make being a conf champ a requirements for them but not for a team that can be the supposed National Champ?

That's stupid.

 

[OregonDucks]

Do not worry. There will be no Alabama/LSU rematch. Just won't happen. The extra CCG Oregon is in will give them well more then enough points to jump an idle Crimson Tide team. It won't happen. The fury it caused back in 2001-02 was something the BCS and CFB does not want again.

 

[huskers1217]

HUSKERS!!!