MAIZEandBLUE09
Well-Known, and Feared, Member
Then the answer is no. Because Harbaugh technically already has a share of a division title.The title should have read: 'Will Michigan win a natty in baseball before Harbaugh wins a division title.'
Then the answer is no. Because Harbaugh technically already has a share of a division title.The title should have read: 'Will Michigan win a natty in baseball before Harbaugh wins a division title.'
That must have been the year Michigan won the conference championship in final two minutes of the game. I forget though who they played.Then the answer is no. Because Harbaugh technically already has a share of a division title.
Harbaugh has one as both a player and a coach.That must have been the year Michigan won the conference championship in final two minutes of the game. I forget though who they played.
Michigan went 1-3 vs Ohio State in baseball this season. Lost the series to them during the season and lost 1st round of B1G Tourney.
Didn't win the division though. If they had, they would've been in Indy. If he won the division, why wasn't he in Indy? That's where the division winners go to decide the conference champ.Then the answer is no. Because Harbaugh technically already has a share of a division title.
Thats a good baseball school up north.I guess we'll just have to settle for the Natty as a consolation prize. The horror.
So when the B10 title used to be able to be split prior to the title game; did both teams not win a B10 title if it were split? Even through the tiebreaker rules where won team got the Rose, both claimed winning a title.Didn't win the division though. If they had, they would've been in Indy. If he won the division, why wasn't he in Indy? That's where the division winners go to decide the conference champ.
Are we still in the time where the B10 title used to be able to be split prior to the title game?So when the B10 title used to be able to be split prior to the title game; did both teams not win a B10 title if it were split? Even through the tiebreaker rules where won team got the Rose, both claimed winning a title.
No, but we are in a time where division titles are split the same way and broken by written tiebreakers.Are we still in the time where the B10 title used to be able to be split prior to the title game?
Harbaugh has one as both a player and a coach.
If you won the B10, you go to the rose bowl....except when there were two. How is this different? The only thing that's changed is the tie exists at the division level now and the tiebreak winner goes to the CCG instead of the Rose bowl.View attachment 208697
If you've won your division, you play in the conference CG. When has Harbaugh done that?
The conference? never. But he has a division title, technically. It's not a title to be proud of but it's certainly there by technicality.What year did Harbaugh win a conference crown as meeechegan's coach? In 2015 Michigan State & Iowa played for the title. In 2016 Penn State & Wisky played. In 2017 Ohio State & Wisky. In 2018 Ohio State & NW.
You claim Harbaugh won a conference crown yet oddly enough Hiz Boyz haven't played in the title game since he's returned to ann arbor. Does you over the top (and incorrect) homerism ever end?
The conference? never. But he has a division title, technically. It's not a title to be proud of but it's certainly there by technicality.
If you won the B10, you go to the rose bowl....except when there were two. How is this different? The only thing that's changed is the tie exists at the division level now and the tiebreak winner goes to the CCG instead of the Rose bowl.
Michigan Earns Share of East Division TitleView attachment 208701
So the winner was Ohio State then, and not michigan. You managed to have the same conference record, but you didn't win the division.
Did I say it was from coaching at Michigan? I said "as a coach"....and he's coached at more places than at Michigan FYI.In comment # 23 you said Harbaugh has a conference crown as a player & coach. You're full of shit. As usual.
Did I say it was from coaching at Michigan? I said "as a coach"....and he's coached at more places than at Michigan FYI.
Look at those Michigan title winners sitting home during the CCG.
Right, I said he won it as both a player and a coach. I understand the comment I quoted was talking about a very specific circumstance to take a dig at Michigan. I was not suggesting he's done so as a coach at Michigan. I'm sorry you're confused.Comment # 22. That must have been the year meeeechegan won the conference championship
The very next comment you said Harbaugh's won a conference crown as a player & coach. You were clearly talking about JH's time in ann arbor & nothing else.