POLL Will Michigan Baseball win a title before Jim Harbaugh?

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Look at those Michigan title winners sitting home during the CCG.

No different than B10 champs who didn't go to the Rose bowl under the old system.

 

[Wamu]

Right, I said he won it as both a player and a coach. I understand the comment I quoted was talking about a very specific circumstance to take a dig at Michigan. I was not suggesting he's done so as a coach at Michigan. I'm sorry you're confused.

The only one confused is you. All I've done is called you out for your incorrect (and nonstop) homerism of Harbaugh. Funny you can't/won't accept the fact that he isn't the great CFB you think he is.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

The only one confused is you. All I've done is called you out for your incorrect (and nonstop) homerism of Harbaugh. Funny you can't/won't accept the fact that he isn't the great CFB you think he is.

Nothing I said was incorrect. Harbaugh has won a title as both a player and coach. Again, I'm sorry you're confused.

 

[Deep Creek]

Michigan went 1-3 vs Ohio State in baseball this season. Lost the series to them during the season and lost 1st round of B1G Tourney.

Don't matter. Texas Tech swept Michigan in a three game series in March by a combined score of 29-10.

Then turns around in June and loses twice to them by a combined score of 20-6!

What a difference three months makes.

 

[Wamu]

Nothing I said was incorrect. Harbaugh has won a title as both a player and coach. Again, I'm sorry you're confused.

Don't forget to mention what Harbaugh did as a coach in the NFL. Because what he did w/ the 49ers holds as much weight as his meaningless FCS conference crown on the FBS level.

Harbaugh's the only CFB in the history of the game that has fans (well to be fair you & that goofball trustmeimright) calling him a great coach with a very incomplete FBS coaching resume. He's won nothing. Odd you don't ubderstand that.

How many national titles have you won for meeeechegan on your video game system?

 

[Across The Field]

Michigan Earns Share of East Division Title

Literally from the B10

I guess I'm condused then, because shouldn't they have also had a chance to play in Indy?

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Don't forget to mention what Harbaugh did as a coach in the NFL. Because what he did w/ the 49ers holds as much weight as his meaningless FCS conference crown on the FBS level.

Harbaugh's the only CFB in the history of the game that has fans (well to be fair you & that goofball trustmeimright) calling him a great coach with a very incomplete FBS coaching resume. He's won nothing. Odd you don't ubderstand that.

How many national titles have you won for meeeechegan on your video game system?

His accomplishments stem from turning around terrible programs/teams and making them contenders. I don't think you'd be able to name many coaches who've taken over teams like Stanford, the 49ers and Michigan and been able to take them from bad to good in a few seasons.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

I guess I'm condused then, because shouldn't they have also had a chance to play in Indy?

Were you confused in 2008 when OSU claimed a share of the B10 title but lost to the other co-champ that year?

 

[ellupo]

No different than B10 champs who didn't go to the Rose bowl under the old system.

Michigan did that too...

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Michigan did that too...

Of course....which is why it's no different now. OSU won the tie breaker for the division but the teams tied; we both had the same number of B10 losses.

 

[Across The Field]

Were you confused in 2008 when OSU claimed a share of the B10 title but lost to the other co-champ that year?

So you'd rather change the subject than answer the simple question?

You claim Harbaugh won the division, however he didn't play in the conference title game, which is a matchup of the two division winners. You claim there was a tie-breaker, which by it's definition determines a winner, so that means Ohio State won the division.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

So you'd rather change the subject than answer the simple question?

You claim Harbaugh won the division, however he didn't play in the conference title game, which is a matchup of the two division winners. You claim there was a tie-breaker, which by it's definition determines a winner, so that means Ohio State won the division.

So did OSU not win a conference title in 2008? Your own team site lists it as an accomplishment

https://ohiostatebuckeyes.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/7_Award-Winners-History.pdf

But according to your logic, there was only 1 winner that year - Penn State?

 

[Across The Field]

So did OSU not win a conference title in 2008? Your own team site lists it as an accomplishment

https://ohiostatebuckeyes.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/7_Award-Winners-History.pdf

But according to your logic, there was only 1 winner that year - Penn State?

So you admit Ohio State won the division but would rather change the subject than admit to that. I'm glad we're clear.

 

[Wamu]

His accomplishments stem from turning around terrible programs/teams and making them contenders. I don't think you'd be able to name many coaches who've taken over teams like Stanford, the 49ers and Michigan and been able to take them from bad to good in a few seasons.

I've never said he isn't a good coach. I've said plenty of times he's a damn good coach. But he's won nothing on the FBS level. You just refuse to acknowledge that fact.

Your excuses for his incomplete CFB coaching resume are as follows.

-he's a great CFB coach beacuse he won a conference crown on the FCS level
-he's a great CFB coach but hasn't won his division or his conference
-he's a great CFB coach because of what he did in the NFL w/ the 49ers
-he's a great CFB coach but has a losing record against Ohio State & Sparty
-he's a great CFB coach but has a losing bowl record

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

So you admit Ohio State won the division but would rather change the subject than admit to that. I'm glad we're clear.

Both teams won the division, as in accordance with B10 rules.

 

[ellupo]

Of course....which is why it's no different now. OSU won the tie breaker for the division but the teams tied; we both had the same number of B10 losses.

Semantics one team was the champ and played the other was not and watched.

 

[Across The Field]

Both teams won the division, as in accordance with B10 rules.

Then why didn't michigan play in the Conference Title Game? In accordance with B10 rules, that has both division winners playing each other.

 

[BamaDude]

It looks like a possibility, but don't count Vandy out just yet.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Then why didn't michigan play in the Conference Title Game? In accordance with B10 rules, that has both division winners playing each other.

Because when a there's a tie for the division title and two teams share the title, one team of the two winners has to advance. In this case, written rules determine which of the two division winners advances to the title game.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Semantics one team was the champ and played the other was not and watched.

If my semantics you mean written B10 rules....