Big titles thread

[Hs0022]

They have Fed at 54, Novak at 52 and Nadal at 50 but they are forgetting how many finals Fed's been in. They should compare finals reached as well and Nadal to be honest won-the bulk of his masters on clay.

 

[nuraman00]

Federer:

22 Masters titles on hard courts
6 on clay

Finals:

12 hard courts
10 on clay

Djokovic:

24 on hard courts
8 on clay

Finals:

9 on hard courts
6 on clay

Nadal:

9 on hard courts
24 on clay

Finals:

9 on hard courts
7 on clay

If they're on different surfaces, so what? All of these players have won and made finals on all surfaces.

 

[Hs0022]

Federer:

22 Masters titles on hard courts
6 on clay

Finals:

12 hard courts
10 on clay

Djokovic:

24 on hard courts
8 on clay

Finals:

9 on hard courts
6 on clay

Nadal:

9 on hard courts
24 on clay

Finals:

9 on hard courts
7 on clay

why are there less number of finals reached than titles won? i am not sure i am following.
If they're on different surfaces, so what? All of these players have won and made finals on all surfaces.

 

[tabascojet]

oh wait you said titles....my bad

 

[Edonidd]

oh wait you said titles....my bad

That's what I read too, and what I came for. I was about to be disappointed. But who could be disappointed after seeing that?

 

[nuraman00]

Federer:

22 Masters titles on hard courts
6 on clay

Finals:

12 hard courts
10 on clay

Djokovic:

24 on hard courts
8 on clay

Finals:

9 on hard courts
6 on clay

Nadal:

9 on hard courts
24 on clay

Finals:

9 on hard courts
7 on clay

If they're on different surfaces, so what? All of these players have won and made finals on all surfaces.

why are there less number of finals reached than titles won? i am not sure i am following.

I separated them from titles, vs. Finals losses.

So for example, FED has 22 Masters titles on hard courts, and 12 more Masters 1000 Finals.

He has 6 Masters 1000s on clay courts, and 10 more Masters 1000 Finals on clay courts.

 

[cezero]

 

[ill]

oh wait you said titles....my bad

I mean, Halep had a nice set before her reduction...I am sure they look nice now, but before, yowsers.

 

[Hs0022]

Big titties get in the way of Big Titles. Just look at Serena.

 

[ill]

Big titties get in the way of Big Titles. Just look at Serena.

I don't agree. Serena has always had big titties and she has won plenty

Halep is the one you want to reference. She became much better once she got her reduction.

 

[Hs0022]

Novak is closing in on Fed. 53 vs 54. This whole “big title” concept is a lame one. For those following tennis since the 80s or earlier this is somewhat idiotic. Slams are slams and masters are masters and the ATP has gone through a lot of evolution.