politics thread

[skinsdad62]

Dad several people Trump brought in have plead guilty to felonies. These are people with means to hire the best legal council but they had no choice because they were guilty. Given this fact I'll ask you again to defend the promise to "Drain the Swamp of Corruption".

and what felonies DGF ? nothing to do with collusion . and most before his was considering running

 

[j_y19]

His leadership style is also his policy style though. So that is a problem. He feels he can bully his way in policy. And his policy starts with whats best for Trump. Morphs into how will it affect the country. And ends with, fuck the country as long as it works out best for Trump.

So if you got no problem with his policy, then you should have no problem with the person, because they are one in the same.

Sorry, but it’s not that simple. And some of his policies I have no problem with. Some I do. But I have a huge issue with him as a man.

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

well apparently you are schooled enough in the topic to know about it . ever hear of the steele dossier ? look at who wrote it , where the lies came from , who paid for it ? . uranium one ring a bell ? . and obamas cronies in the fbi allowed this to happen and his doj and fbi were full of corrupt investigators . all of these things that happened in this election are linked and most on the HRC side werent even looked at

Please stay on point. We are discussing President Trumps promise to drain the swamp of corruption. Your refusal to address the point sure shows me you have no response to my contention that his promise was a crock of shit, he did in fact the complete opposite.

I invite you to show me where I'm wrong. One more reference to Hillary, or anything else, proves you are like all his other supporters. When challenged you crawl under the bed. Don't be that guy, show me where he did not break that promise.

 

[skinsdad62]

ever hear of , if you want your dr you can keep him or her ? how about the INS you can keep your plan ? didnt see you pipe up when that shit went down

i didnt know what the "C" meant . nothing from you either nothing about rigging the primary against bernie either from you on that either

nothing from you on the lois lerner front either

 

[skinsdad62]

Please stay on point. We are discussing President Trumps promise to drain the swamp of corruption. Your refusal to address the point sure shows me you have no response to my contention that his promise was a crock of shit, he did in fact the complete opposite.

I invite you to show me where I'm wrong. One more reference to Hillary or anything else, proves you are like all his other supporters. When challenged you crawl under the bed. Don't be that guy, show me where he did not break that promise.

its all a part of it . people like you giving a pass to people you like but wanting to crucify ones you dont

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

Sorry, but it’s not that simple. And some of his policies I have no problem with. Some I do. But I have a huge issue with him as a man.

That's where I am. As I said earlier I support many of his ideas to put America first etc. I'm not afraid to praise a man I despise. The issue I have is his supporters are unable to be critical. Ever. Seeing as nobody is perfect and President Trump has obviously made missteps this calls his supporter's credibility into serious question.

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

its all a part of it . people like you giving a pass to people you like but wanting to crucify ones you dont

So you got nothing, gonna crawl under the bed as you accuse me of the exact behavior you are demonstrating. That's what I thought.

Thanks for playing,

 

[skinsdad62]

So you got nothing, gonna crawl under the bed as you accuse me of the exact behavior you are demonstrating. That's what I thought.

Thanks for playing,

no one crawling under any bed . its you not wanting to face the facts . the election had issues and only one side got investigated , when the guy being investigated had his rights routinely violated starting with the fisa warrant you want to define limited parameters because you cant refute what i am saying . wont work with me

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

no one crawling under any bed . its you not wanting to face the facts . the election had issues and only one side got investigated , when the guy being investigated had his rights routinely violated starting with the fisa warrant you want to define limited parameters because you cant refute what i am saying . wont work with me

I was simply asking you to defend the President's promise to drain the swamp. That was all I was asking you to do and to prove to me that just one Trump supporter will address the issues and not deflect to other topics.

Like all the rest you refused to address the issue, you crawled under the bed instead of addressing the issue. You continue to change the topic because you flat out refuse to address the issue.

That obviously isn't going to change so I'll thank you for proving my point and move on out of here for now.

Peace.

 

[Stymietee]

You lying piece of shit. I defined it when you asked. You still dodged the question like a pussy.

And you're still dodging like a pussy now.

So why do illegal immigrants come here instead of to glorious Bolivia? Dodge it again...

Great, a poster who doesn't know the difference between defining and equating. Answer the question and I'll oblige you. Calling immigrants, legal or otherwise, scum, does not give clarity to what you mean by "scum."

 

[skinsdad62]

I was simply asking you to defend the President's promise to drain the swamp. That was all I was asking you to do and to prove to me that just one Trump supporter will address the issues and not deflect to other topics.

Like all the rest you refused to address the issue, you crawled under the bed instead of addressing the issue. You continue to change the topic because you flat out refuse to address the issue.

That obviously isn't going to change so I'll thank you for proving my point and move on out of here for now.

Peace.

ok well easy , he is in the process of it . but you think that trying to railroad me is going to work it wont . and again if your standard applies to one it should apply to another . name one presidential candidate at any time anywhere in history who didnt say they would "clean up washington ' ? no one crawled under a bed . however you ceratinly want to put on blinders to all else calling it a deflection when in fact its all the same issue

 

[Stymietee]

It’s not a game it’s business and ratings. I even watch the fucking libs on msnbc sometimes for a good laugh

Good to know! Conservatives overwhelmingly own and operate what's labeled the "MSM" and they allow all of these stories that offend you and others, yet you apparently haven't figured out why conservative owners would do something like this?

Right, no games being played there on the masses....UNLESS...a lot of it (their reports/stories) is true!

 

[Stymietee]

Scum come illegally.
Good people get in line.
@Stymietee acts cowardly because he knows answering the question truthfully destroys his entire conception of the false reality he has constructed.

Migrants come to the US more than Bolivia because it's better. That's a truth a coward like stymie is too afraid to put into words here. He'd rather obfuscate because he can't compete using logic. It's his lack of ability to compete that has him falling for socialist tropes in the first place.

Seriously, learn to understand what you read.

The Bolivia reference related to all of the talk about Venezuela. Go back and check it!

You have no idea what logic is or how to apply it, that's clear.

Sir, and I use that descriptive advisedly, whether you want to admit it or not, you too support socialism. Maybe you don't know that, or maybe you do and just can't be honest with yourself about the game that political BS artists have played on you, it really doesn't matter to me beyond what it's doing to this country.

 

[Stymietee]

The illegal immigrants. Why do they come here so much more than Bolivia?

I have asked this question multiple times now without using the word that holds so much emotional connotation for you two folks. So with that word now struck, do you think our fine coward @Stymietee will have enough courage to man up and answer this very appropriate, very relevant and now very decent question?

Coward huh? it's news but good to know that about myself. I am curious though, if I'm a coward and you can't touch me competitively on either an intellectual or physical level, what exactly does that make you? Never mind, I know, an Illegal immigrant or better your definition of the same. (see and I never cursed or lowered myself to name calling even though I'm from what you might call the "hood")

 

[j_y19]

That's where I am. As I said earlier I support many of his ideas to put America first etc. I'm not afraid to praise a man I despise. The issue I have is his supporters are unable to be critical. Ever. Seeing as nobody is perfect and President Trump has obviously made missteps this calls his supporter's credibility into serious question.

Nobody's supporters can be critical. That holds true for Presidents on either side of the aisle. Its just his turn.

 

[Stymietee]

It's almost as if you can't acknowledge how equally biased Fox is in their coverage. They are giving you an equally distorted view with their coverage, not sure why the right can't acknowledge this obvious fact.

It is interesting that some here refer to the "MSM" without realizing that FOX is actually part of the same. Almost all are owned and operated by conservatives and yet there's always some boogieman "liberal" bend to news reporting. Few ask why and fewer want to know why. It's honestly a shame that people desire something to be against, instead of something to be in favor of.

 

[skinsdad62]

Good to know! Conservatives overwhelmingly own and operate what's labeled the "MSM" and they allow all of these stories that offend you and others, yet you apparently haven't figured out why conservative owners would do something like this?

Right, no games being played there on the masses....UNLESS...a lot of it (their reports/stories) is true!

Again who runs them ? Libs

 

[Stymietee]

Nope I don’t see your evidence as close to being valid

So you don't believe that the "MSM" is overwhelmingly owned and operated by conservatives? Really?

So, let's play it your way, I:E the stuff on "liberal" media is mostly false and "conservative" media is mostly reliable. Is this right? (correct me if I'm inaccurate in any way)

 

[Stymietee]

Again who runs them ? Libs

Here's the game, if you (you = @dad) owned a news operation and the reporting was false or just plain BS as some here call it. Why on earth would YOU as the boss/owner allow it? Please answer this! Why would you hire "lib's" to operate your business if you didn't approve of what they were doing?

 

[Toadman005]

So you don't believe that the "MSM" is overwhelmingly owned and operated by conservatives? Really?

So, let's play it your way, I:E the stuff on "liberal" media is mostly false and "conservative" media is mostly reliable. Is this right? (correct me if I'm inaccurate in any way)

Even if most media is owned and operated by conservatives (not true), the vast majority of media outlets are left leaning.