- Thread starter
- #141
knowyourenemy
Well-Known Member
The line has moved up to 6.
Huh? The bears would have played before the rams before things were adjusted.Yeah, I think the Eagles actually benefit from the time changes. I’m still curious about that line. Maybe you’re right about the Chicago-Minnesota angle.
They were literally missing their top five cbs and a starting safety at one point. They've got some back and others have stepped up. The defensive line has gotten back to playing the way they should is the biggest key on defense.That's fair. I just see their overall numbers and have read Eagles fans here talking hyperbolically about "this is the worst secondary of all-time". I still like us at home, but I would rather have Minnesota.
Which is a conundrum, because I can't root against the Bears and still have slim/outside hope for a bye.
Eagles just beat them there. Must be easy.I'm just making sure that you're aware the Bears won't play the same team in their 2nd playoff game as their 1st. It's a single elimination tournament. You seem to not understand the difference between the Wild Card and Divisional Round. You seem to believe that from round-to-round the matchups don't get more difficult.
The difference between playing a 9 win wild card team at home vs playing LA in LA for the Bears is enormous.
Again... did you not see that much of a difference between 9-7 Buffalo last season vs playing #1 NE or #2 PIT? Goodness gracious. That's a world of difference.
Huh? The bears would have played before the rams before things were adjusted.
depends on who u use
vegasinsider uses an avg of all betting
looks like its about right where vegas wants it
View attachment 194360
I do not like this poster but how can they lose to the Eagles when the Eagles won't be going?
70% of people taking the money line for Minnesota is...interesting.