shopson67
Well-Known Member
He's all yours, Mavs. Does this mean they aren't targeting a big in the draft?
They aren't beating the Warriors.A contender, yes. They aren’t beating the W’s with two SF’s as good as they are bc in this scenario you are giving up players for Kawhi and only getting one bigtime FA. You do get to sign Randle but you are a giving up a combination of Ball, Ingram and Kuzma maybe all of them. They would have some flexibility.
Say they sign Randle to a 4 year 60 mil. 15/yr which is about right.
PG 30 mil
Trade for Kawhi 30M but they give up Kuzma, Ingram and Ball straight up for him.
They have about 89M in salaries unless they can somehow move that Deng contract. If they could they would have closer to 30M to try and sign maybe Cousins with this duo. So still a very good roster but with Lebron it would be Warriors and Lakers at the top, possibly making the Lakers better. This roster isnt beating GS imo
They are trying to trade up for Doncic.He's all yours, Mavs. Does this mean they aren't targeting a big in the draft?
The Spurs when the Lakers called
![]()
They are trying to trade up for Doncic
Sign and trade? What would they give up?
The Heat are capped out, so the salaries have to match within 80% (at least 28.5M). It certainly won't be Whiteside, and Tyler Johnson is way overpaid (AND has a 15% trade kicker). Cavs will want Richardson, Winslow, and probably Dragic. Doesn't leave much in Miami for Lebron to play with.
I don't see that happening.
Sign and trade? What would they give up?
Nothing.
I was just trying to stir the pot.