- Thread starter
- #1
And let's be honest, if that 33-year-old Rodgers wasn't in the twilight of his career, unlike that upstart, 32-year-old Matt Ryan, he would have accomplished this last year and thrown 43 TD passes rather than the pitiful 40 he had to settle for.but, but - Sam Bradford has a better QB rating
It's unprecedented.Great. And ...?
Marvelous, chalk up another stat for the omnipotent QB. Overall, TEAMS needs good stats too, according to the experts in here, and everywhere else.It's unprecedented.
When you break a record in nearly a full season less than the next best it's somewhat noteworthy. Not to mention he has a good shot to get to 400 TDs before his 100th interception when no one had even done it at 300.
True, and Ted Thompson is too stubborn and frugal to go after decent free agents. The GB roster is certainly lacking.Marvelous, chalk up another stat for the omnipotent QB. Overall, TEAMS needs good stats too, according to the experts in here, and everywhere else.
Yep, I 'm sure most people say in here that some part of Rodgers is being "wasted" in GB, but I doubt it.True, and Ted Thompson is too stubborn to go after decent free agents. The GB roster is certainly lacking.
True, and Ted Thompson is too stubborn and frugal to go after decent free agents. The GB roster is certainly lacking.
Kinda funny to see Rodgers 300 TDs compared to Brady's last 300 TDs, where their careers overlap fully instead of looking at two different passing ears.It's unprecedented.
When you break a record in nearly a full season less than the next best it's somewhat noteworthy. Not to mention he has a good shot to get to 400 TDs before his 100th interception when no one had even done it at 300.
Kinda funny to see Rodgers 300 TDs compared to Brady's last 300 TDs, where their careers overlap fully instead of looking at two different passing ears.
Rodgers: 300 TD/74 INT
Brady: 300 TD/72 INT