- Thread starter
- #1
nah. the name and logo are ok. they arent cartoonish depictions.Chiefs name change 2040 herewecome
All bow before PC culture!
I don't think that's the core issue these groups have. It's not even the fact the name is Redskins, Chiefs, Indians or Braves, it's the representation of it. The very fact it is depiction without their say so bothers them. Not a problem for the Utah Utes or FSU, is going to be for the pro clubs down the road. At least, that's the branch that's most politically active with this kind of stuff, just my opinion.nah. the name and logo are ok. they arent cartoonish depictions.
I'm about as non PC as they come, but the Wahoo had to go.
Keep the name, develop a logo that honors the people.
Drama drama dramaJust wait until the liberals tell us how the word "Patriots" is offensive and promotes white nationalism. It's coming.
Chief Wahoo was developed to honor the people.
Louis Sockalexis - Wikipedia
Although Sockalexis had a brief career, he faced many obstacles during his time in professional baseball. It was reported that fans of the opposing teams often shouted racial slurs toward him due to his Penobscot heritage. Additionally, fans imitated war whoops and war dances in his presence.[1]Later, when sports journalists attributed his rapid decline to alcoholism, they identified the disease as the inherent "Indian weakness".[1]
When the Cleveland Naps changed their name to the Indians in 1915, the franchise did so to honor Sockalexis.[7] The Indians' official media guide says that the owners solicited sportswriters to ask fans for their favorite nickname, and the name Indians was chosen by a young girl who wrote to one of the sportswriters whose column requested suggestions. She specifically mentioned Sockalexis and his heritage.
no, i dont think so.Just wait until the liberals tell us how the word "Patriots" is offensive and promotes white nationalism. It's coming.
no no, it's going to happen! He has to somehow make himself the victim instead of actually understanding the issue.no, i dont think so.
I don't think that's the core issue these groups have. It's not even the fact the name is Redskins, Chiefs, Indians or Braves, it's the representation of it. The very fact it is depiction without their say so bothers them. Not a problem for the Utah Utes or FSU, is going to be for the pro clubs down the road. At least, that's the branch that's most politically active with this kind of stuff, just my opinion.
that logo was not created by a childThe agenda behind all fake political outrage is to tear down history. It starts with statues and sports logos and ends with calling criminals "dreamers", and and legal Americans "racists." This is how and why our Constitutional Rights are attacked by career politicians. Imagine a smiling cartoon character created by a child is all of a sudden racist. How brainwashed can people be?