- Thread starter
- #21
deerpathdave
Well-Known Member
It's pretty funny that you can call Howie's moves wasting money before the fact and not call Chip's moves wasting money after it was already proven. Well not "funny," more like "asinine." You are simply engaging in "emotional computing" here. Although I use the term "computing" lightly as it overstates the analysis you've pretended to do here.
So even Chip's worst signing (Murray) was tradeable a year later and the contract was structured as such that the cost against the cap was only about $4M in dead money. You expect to pay a premium for the league's leading rusher. You don't expect to pay a premium for a 29 year old backup with 2 career starts.