Big12so will UCLA go with Reebok? Russell? Champion?
UCLA should quit whining.Under Armour to discontinue record apparel partnership with UCLA
UCLA is fighting it but Under Armour says it has a legal clause that allows them to do it. The claim is that Under Armour isn't receiving the marketing benefit they paid for.
This is interesting territory as I don't recall this happening before and particularly to a P5 program.
I thought Under Armor was the one that wanted out.Oh I'm sure the Chipper has a backdoor deal in place with Uncle Phil....
It's business and UCLA just got out of a contract without having to go to court !
so will UCLA go with Reebok? Russell? Champion?
I thought Under Armor was the one that wanted out.
I'd still sue them for breach of contract. Unless there are some embarrassing sells numbers they don't want published there is too much money to walk away from.They do, he is saying it won’t cost CLA anything to go with Nike now.
I'd still sue them for breach of contract. Unless there are some embarrassing sells numbers they don't want published there is too much money to walk away from.
so will UCLA go with Reebok? Russell? Champion?
so will UCLA go with Reebok? Russell? Champion?
I thought Under Armor was the one that wanted out.
I'm going to need links because what you're saying doesn't pass the smell test.Under Armor wasn't getting paid so they did what everyone does with a non paying contract , ( UCLA wasn't paying UA to force them to back out)