- Thread starter
- #1
less competition to targets.
This is my thought as well. Who know what you get with Luck after 2 yrs of absence and despite a lot of hype who knows what you get with Mahomes ? - - plus both receivers are proven big one week and crap the next. I'd rather go with a guy who is more consistent even if his peak is something below Hill/Hilton's - I'm conservative in that way. ....Think Hill will have a tough time repeating his numbers since his effeciency is due for some regression and all the changes doesn’t help, but I’d still pick him over Hilton. Don’t trust Hilton to bounce back. So mostly I hope not to draft either in a redraft league.
ExactlyThis is my thought as well. Who know what you get with Luck after 2 yrs of absence and despite a lot of hype who knows what you get with Mahomes ? - - plus both receivers are proven big one week and crap the next. I'd rather go with a guy who is more consistent even if his peak is something below Hill/Hilton's - I'm conservative in that way. ....
This is true - but some are wayyyy more prone to peaks and valleys than others - those are two of them. ... believe it or not, I actually shy away from Julio for the same exact reason. ... 30pts this week, 4 the next - but if you take them, you absolutely HAVE to keep them in the lineup and hope for the best since you never know when they blow up or tank. ....I think Hilton is under appreciated. A lot of WR have ebbs and peaks. @Trudem brings up a great point about targets.
Hypothetical: it's the end of round 3... both Hill and Hilton are surprisingly still on the board... regardless of your doubts they're a good value at this point...
Who do you take?
Gotta be Hilton.