Robotech
Well-Known Member
It's after the fact. At the time the decision was made, it wasn't the right decision. You don't bench a top 5 QB if he misses a game with an injury. it just isn't done on any level.
My point now is that it is easy to say that the right decision was made after the season and seeing the results. The reason I say that the Super Bowl doesn't matter in this decision is because the decision was made in the middle of the season and the discussion was supposed to be within that context. Another reason is because Smith played well enough to make the Super Bowl last year and without the 2 botched kicks would have made the game last year.
If you want to argue that it was the right decision now based on results, at least acknowledge that at the time it was move that typically wasn't made and that Smith, while playing better than almost everyone in the NFL was screwed out of his spot.
I fully supported the decision from the beginning. I felt it was the right decision then, and I feel it is the right decision now. I'm late to this thread, but you can see my posts in the Niners board where I voiced my opinion that the Niners should continue with Kaep as the starter when it was still up in the air who Harbaugh would go with. Believe it or not, as well as Smith played this season and last season, many (maybe even the majority of) Niner fans were ready to take the leap of faith with Kaepernick. I wanted Kaep to continue as the starter because he just has that big play ability that Alex doesn't. It's playmaker versus game manager.
It definitely was not a typical decision. The easy decision would've been to go back to Smith as the starter. That would've been low risk and he would've faced little to no criticism for that.
I feel bad for Alex, but Harbaugh made the decision that he felt was best for the team. Harbaugh would've been screwing the team and the fans if he chose to go with the lesser QB.