Mecca
ClipGangOrDontBang
Rings are the deciding factor FOR ME, when all other things are equal.Really?
You can't just look at 1 stat. Yes. MJ was a better scorer. LeBron is better statistically in many other areas and he scores more efficiently than MJ did (both were highly efficient scorers).
Rings are team achievements. LeBron is unlikely to win another because to do so he would have to beat the Warriors who are the vastly superior team. Jordan never had to face anyone even in the ballpark of being as good as the Warriors. The Bulls were the dominant force in the NBA from the 90s, and it was about more than just MJ. They had great complimentary pieces too. The Warriors are the dominant force today.
If ring count is all that matters, are the same people going to say KD and Curry are in the GOAT conversation if they run off 5 or 6? I hope not, because LeBron is clearly the superior individual player.
LeBron has not passed MJ, but it could be a legit debate in a few years. It is closer now than most would care to admit.
Otherwise, Mark Madsen > Malone > Barkley
With that being said, all things are not equal between Kobe and LeBron.
Lebron is the better player...imo
In fairness, I look for every opportunity to devalue Kobe...lol
But, only if it's logical.