College fantasy football 2017

[TheDayMan]

I still cant add a long snapper

Sure you can. Just choose what spot you want him to take, I suggest one of the quarterback spots, leave that spot empty, announce to us what long snapper you want in that spot, and boom, you've got you a long snapper.

 

[TheDayMan]

Do you guys want to allow vetoing trades? Didn't realize that was turned on... it was set at 6% (which means it would only take 1 veto to block a trade). I changed it to 3 vetoes needed to block, but will just turn it off if there are no objections to not having that option. Seems stupid to me...

@SteelersPride @Wild Turkey @Judge Fudge @Cowboyinexile @uncfan103 @jwolt92 @Shanemansj13 @Olyduck @ericd7633

 

[TheDayMan]

Do you guys want to allow vetoing trades? Didn't realize that was turned on... it was set at 6% (which means it would only take 1 veto to block a trade). I changed it to 3 vetoes needed to block, but will just turn it off if there are no objections to not having that option. Seems stupid to me...

@SteelersPride @Wild Turkey @Judge Fudge @Cowboyinexile @uncfan103 @jwolt92 @Shanemansj13 @Olyduck @ericd7633

Not only do I not see anyone trying to veto trades in this league, but it adds a waiting period, so if you want a guy for this week's game and make the deal on a Friday, you're out of luck until the next week.

 

[ericd7633]

Do you guys want to allow vetoing trades? Didn't realize that was turned on... it was set at 6% (which means it would only take 1 veto to block a trade). I changed it to 3 vetoes needed to block, but will just turn it off if there are no objections to not having that option. Seems stupid to me...

@SteelersPride @Wild Turkey @Judge Fudge @Cowboyinexile @uncfan103 @jwolt92 @Shanemansj13 @Olyduck @ericd7633

I would say no.

 

[Cowboyinexile]

I'm ok with no veto power.

 

[TheDayMan]

I'll give you guys time to respond. Don't want it to seem like I'm changing rules for my benefit since I only realized because I accepted a trade. We have time for it to clear before games this week anyway. I'll turn it off after the trade clears unless someone wants to keep it.

 

[uncfan103]

We don't need vetoes. None of us are going to do something to hurt our team and increases someone else's chances intentionally.

 

[Judge Fudge]

@TheDayMan I never do 2 for 1. Always 1 for 1 or more

 

[TheDayMan]

@TheDayMan I never do 2 for 1. Always 1 for 1 or more

No problem. I accepted your offer.

 

[Wild Turkey]

No to the vetos.

 

[Olyduck]

I veto the vetos

 

[SteelersPride]

dun care

 

[jwolt92]

I vote no to vetoes. Especially in a keeper/dynasty. Trading away a good SR late in the season for a team in dead last for an up and coming freshman that could be keeper material is just part of strategy, but it could look lopsided

 

[TheDayMan]

I took out the veto option, glad everyone agrees. Trades should just go straight through now.

 

[Olyduck]

all right this is it let the season begin. I got my PAT holder starting tonight

 

[SteelersPride]

im gambling with a wr this week

 

[TheDayMan]

This is the nipple twisters' year. Can feel it in my bone...

 

[SteelersPride]

im always top 2-3 but cant win the playoffs

 

[TheDayMan]

im always top 2-3 but cant win the playoffs

You're like Oregon during their run.

 

[Cowboyinexile]

The title defense begins tonight