rmilia1
Well-Known Member
I said 20+. AND i already gave all the stats. You can post whatever you want but in the last 21 years Oregon has been to 9 BCS bowls. That equals relevant no matter how you try to spin itYou're claiming that the Ducks have been "relevant" for 20 years. Thats since 1997.
Here's their records from 1997 till 2007 which is half of those years.
1997 , 7-5
1998, 8-4
1999, 9-3
2000, 10-2
2001, 11-1
2002, 7-6
2003, 8-5
2004, 5-6
2005, 10-2
2006, 7-6
2007, 9-4
so only 3 years did they win 10 or more and two were together and the next one was five years later. How in the world is this being "relevant"
here's USC s record since Pete left. You know , sanctions, USC being down , Trojans suck, not able to recruit 10 players a year for four years.
2010, 8-5
2011, 10-2
2012, 7-6
2013, 10-4 (with three different coaches)
2014, 9-4
2015, 8-6
2016, 10-3
So USC in seven years of being down and in the middle of sanctions and everyone saying they sucked had just as many 10 win seasons , never won less than 7. But you say oregon was "relevant" with a worse ten years.