- Thread starter
- #121
deanpet21
Well-Known Member
There you go hedging again, our schedule is no more brutal than it was last year.
Did we go to Sea and No last year?
There you go hedging again, our schedule is no more brutal than it was last year.
I said long is a starting center on a top 5 o/ line. Nothing else
Let's see we get less wins and that's improvement ? Most foolish statement I have seen on this board . You are what your record says you are
Did we go to Sea and No last year?
NOpe, we went to Zona, Detroit and Baltimore. Your point?? Oh yea and the London trip
I know but Sea and NO are tougher away games. Wow. just wow.
Board Proclamation
Dean shall now and hence forth be referred to as Spin Master Flex, cause the way you spin would put Dr Dre to shame.
For the record, some one who has pounded the drum hat Cousins stats dont matter because he couldnt step up when it counts, to then go with the line... well we could be a better team and have a worse record.....
Come'on MAN!!!!
no spin its the truth in how NFL games are won. You are saying schedule difficulty has nothing to do with the teams outcome. That is one of the ages. Stop drinking Shark.
IM saying you have made the statement we are a better team. Yet you wont quantify what would constitute as better aside from well we look better on paper.
And IM the one thats drinking??
I told you what I expect if we have actually improved. You have said, we are a better team.. .but havent said HOW or what results would PROVE to you that we are in fact a better team. See again IM not asking what you think we will finish, Im asking what would prove to you that we are in fact a better team??
I will lay it all out for you after the draft. Let me ask you this. If we do finish with 8 wins again and both sides of the ball improve stat wise, do you still want to fire Allen?
Well first off to me that would mean we stayed where we were. But it would also depend on how he handled the rest of this off season. If we are once again looking at the will we sign or trade the QB, or if we are lined up to make another Mega trade for a QB, then hell yes.
But truth is, Allen should have been fired already. Scot came in and cleaned up is mess, he has been handed a team that SHOULD be able to improve on the field. So if we dont, and the front office is once again a circus of he said she said... yes he should be fired.
now if we finish with 5 wins and KC tanks, does Allen deserved to be fired?
There you go again
So in your opinion, if the team doesnt improve.. it can only happen because Cousins tanked? Mind you we have zero evidence to point to that happening??
If we finish with 5 wins, no matter the reason Allen needs to be fired.
If we finish with five wins, KC still throws for 4500+ yards and puts up 29 TDs combined.. does Allen deserve to keep his job?
Is that Spanish for Si y No?Did we go to Sea and No last year?
If KC throws 22 Ints with those 29 Td's I would say yes.
Dean, step away from the keyboard. Do you really think Cousins is going to throw 22 INTs, and in any case you think Allen would deserve to keep his job if this team finished with five wins??
Its possible. Synder will probably fire him but there are so many factors involved.
The biggest factor should be that he has failed as a GM. Aside from a fluke season in 2012, the team has sucked for the majority of the time that he has held the title of GM. As much as you refuse to admit it, Scot cleaned up alot of his messes over the last two years. If Allen takes over and this team goes back to a 3-5 win team.... he needs to be fired period.