Lack Of espect For 49es O East Coast Bias?

[NWPATSFAN]

Week 6 NFL Power Rankings: 1-32 poll, plus every team's top fantasy surprise

Man this must burn some Niners fans. And @NWPATSFAN of course.

Why would it burn me? NE is # 1 AGAIN.

 

[knowyourenemy]

Week 6 NFL Power Rankings: 1-32 poll, plus every team's top fantasy surprise

Man this must burn some Niners fans. And @NWPATSFAN of course.

The Eagles are way too low.

 

[knowyourenemy]

Why would it burn me? NE is # 1 AGAIN.

They’re undefeated and have remained stagnant in the rankings. Pathetic!

 

[flyerhawk]

Why would it burn me? NE is # 1 AGAIN.

You have some weird hatred of the Seahawks and seeing them ahead of the Niners who you are dating now, doesn't help your hatred.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I'm thinking @flyerhawk was just pointing out that BB got the recipe from the Bears game and added his own special seasoning to perfect it. Having said that, for the last 2 years, anybody that has watched the Rams knows the offense relies on Gurley and when he isn't right or being utilized, Goff often struggles to carry the team vs good defenses. McVay's offense relies on play action and misdirection. Goff is not good without that extra time in the pocket. The headphone thing is a key too because Goff has some trouble with pre snap reads. It's why he also usually plays well vs. Seattle. The Hawks play a pretty basic D without a lot if deception usually.

You can put lipstick on a pig if you want? LAR were undefeated against the NFCW last season. BB and co. held the best the NFC had to offer to 3 points. The Rams put up 30 against the Clownboys and Feables.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

They’re undefeated and have remained stagnant in the rankings. Pathetic!

You're right. They should be higher.

 

[knowyourenemy]

How would you feel if you’re a Colts fan? Beat the fuck out of an undefeated team and you’re still ranked low. Then take a look at the Raiders. Wins over the Colts and Bears and they’re way below both teams.

Conclusion: My rankings are better.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

You have some weird hatred of the Seahawks and seeing them ahead of the Niners who you are dating now, doesn't help your hatred.

As usual you're confused.

First I don't hate the Hawks. There are plenty of posts where I've said so. Now certain 12s Pete Carrol. I could care less who's leading that division.

Everything I said is accurate to anyone not wearing Seahawk nuclear green.

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

You can put lipstick on a pig if you want? LAR were undefeated against the NFCW last season. BB and co. held the best the NFC had to offer to 3 points. The Rams put up 30 against the Clownboys and Feables.

I'm not putting lipstick on anything man. Relax. I gave BB his due respect and always have. You know that from me. As for the Cowboys game, anybody who watched knows that was all based on running the ball down the Cowboys throat all night. As I said, Seattle mostly stays in a base defense, regardless of who they play. That is why Goff plays well. He doesn't have to adjust his pre snap reads, which I said he isn't good at. BB was genius in exploiting that and knowing that all the trickery is smoke and mirrors from McVay. Get in Goffs lap and he isn't good. It's what the Bears did earlier and BB, as he always does, perfects it.

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

As for power rankings, I honestly consider them a load of crap, regardles of where my team is ranked.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I'm not putting lipstick on anything man. Relax. I gave BB his due respect and always have. You know that from me. As for the Cowboys game, anybody who watched knows that was all based on running the ball down the Cowboys throat all night. As I said, Seattle mostly stays in a base defense, regardless of who they play. That is why Goff plays well. He doesn't have to adjust his pre snap reads, which I said he isn't good at. BB was genius in exploiting that and knowing that all the trickery is smoke and mirrors from McVay. Get in Goffs lap and he isn't good. It's what the Bears did earlier and BB, as he always does, perfects it.

By trying to say Chi and Phi gave teams a blueprint by giving up 30 is putting lipstick on a pig.
Any good team would gameplan and run against the Cowboys. Not sure how this adds any substance to your point?

 

[knowyourenemy]

By trying to say Chi and Phi gave teams a blueprint by giving up 30 is putting lipstick on a pig.
Any good team would gameplan and run against the Cowboys. Not sure how this adds any substance to your point?

I don’t recall Chicago or Philly giving up 30 to the Rams?

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

By trying to say Chi and Phi gave teams a blueprint by giving up 30 is putting lipstick on a pig.
Any good team would gameplan and run against the Cowboys. Not sure how this adds any substance to your point?

You keep mentioning Philly. Not sure why as I have never said a thing about them. And I never once have used the term "blueprint" and never will. I think the term is bullshit. Every coach in football watches game film on opponents and uses parts of what other teams have done. This is common knowledge and again, as I have said, BB is the master at finding little nuances in that and exploiting them. That is why he is the greatest coach ever in my opinion. I don't know why you are in such a tizzy about all of this @NWPATSFAN . I just don't get your need to argue every time a Seahawks fan makes a statement even when it validates your guy and your point in general.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I don’t recall Chicago or Philly giving up 30 to the Rams?

They lost to Philly 30-23 week 15. My bad they gave up 15 to Chicago. They also gave up 45 to NO.
They had at least 12 games where they scored 30+.
NE held them to 3. q

 

[Shanemansj13]

Niners are a solid team. They have solid lines and have speed all around the field, their DL has great potential as well. Secondary is the only question mark but overall they look like a playoff team to this point. Can't say too many bad things about that team, they have competitors.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

You keep mentioning Philly. Not sure why as I have never said a thing about them. And I never once have used the term "blueprint" and never will. I think the term is bullshit. Every coach in football watches game film on opponents and uses parts of what other teams have done. This is common knowledge and again, as I have said, BB is the master at finding little nuances in that and exploiting them. That is why he is the greatest coach ever in my opinion. I don't know why you are in such a tizzy about all of this @NWPATSFAN . I just don't get your need to argue every time a Seahawks fan makes a statement even when it validates your guy and your point in general.

You and I are not the only two discussing this. Flyer introduced that LAR fell off the cliff around week 12. As usual I pointed out the inaccuracy of that statement. They played a top ranked NFC D week 15 and lost 30-23. That team was the Eagles. See how this all fits together.

Doesn't matter which team someone is a fan of. If they're wrong they're wrong. Just so happens many of the 12s are confused quite often so it appears I'm singleing them out.

 

[knowyourenemy]

They lost to Philly 30-23 week 15. My bad they gave up 15 to Chicago. They also gave up 45 to NO.
They had at least 12 games where they scored 30+.
NE held them to 3. q

What’s your point then? They’ve scored 27+ in 4 of the 5 games this season and haven’t scored fewer than 20 in a game yet. They have 344+ yards of total offense in every game. Their loss to Seattle was on a missed FG. Their offense had no issues in their loss to the Bucs.

What exactly did other teams learn from Belichick in last year’s super bowl (other than that he’s the best coach ever and everyone knew that already)?

 

[Sharkonabicycle]

Rams and Seattle feel too high. The game could've gone either way based on a field goal kick that wasn't mega far, and not many of the wins those teams had were impressive, while the loss to other teams were UGLY (Bucs and Saints).

Seattle has a bit more of a ceiling given Jarran Reed is back next week and Ansah is slowly getting up to speed, but I'd still put them towards the double digits... Rams don't seem the same. Their OLINE is not what it was last year which means Goff will get exposed against defenses that actually blitz (Jesus Christ Seattle...) or get SOME form of pressure, and Gurley is nowhere NEAR as effective as early 2018. He did fuck all against Seattle outside of his nice 12 yard run (1 yard TD is whatever).

49ers haven't played a really tough team yet... and I'm still not sold JG can take over the game if a team stuffs the run. I dunno, NFC West seems a little high to me but the 49ers so far look like the best crew given their O/D-Line is the best in the division (Seattle may be able to argue D-Line once Reed comes back). Just not ready to crown them as a division favorite until I see JG show a bit more.

 

[flyerhawk]

You and I are not the only two discussing this. Flyer introduced that LAR fell off the cliff around week 12. As usual I pointed out the inaccuracy of that statement. They played a top ranked NFC D week 15 and lost 30-23. That team was the Eagles. See how this all fits together.

Doesn't matter which team someone is a fan of. If they're wrong they're wrong. Just so happens many of the 12s are confused quite often so it appears I'm singleing them out.

As usual, you try to frame your claims to suit your "Let's always talk about the Patriots" bullshit.

You claimed that the Patriots showed the league how to beat the Rams. I said that was not true. I said that the Rams offense fell off a cliff in week 12 of 2018. That doesn't mean that they became the worst offense in football. But they stopped being an elite offense.

In their first 12 games they scored 30+ points in every game they played but 2. The Bears kept them to 6. The Eagles kept them to 23. The Saints kept them to 26.

So far this season the fewest points they have scored is 20. The 2nd fewest is 27. They have average 29 points a game this season. After week 12 of last season, and including the playoffs, the Rams averaged 23 points a game. Exclude the Super Bowl and they scored 27 points a game.

So the Rams are scoring more per game this season than they did in the 2nd half of last season. So your claim that the Patriots showed the league how to beat the Rams is not consistent with the facts.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

What’s your point then? They’ve scored 27+ in 4 of the 5 games this season and haven’t scored fewer than 20 in a game yet. They have 344+ yards of total offense in every game. Their loss to Seattle was on a missed FG. Their offense had no issues in their loss to the Bucs.

What exactly did other teams learn from Belichick in last year’s super bowl (other than that he’s the best coach ever and everyone knew that already)?

Too tired to do the math but they were averaging over 35 a game for the entire season last year.

Goff's #s have dropped and they haven't played a decent D yet. He has 7 TDs to 7 INTs.

No NFCW team beat the Rams last season. They've played one division game and already have a loss.

There is a lot more to football than just your FFL stats.