- Thread starter
- #14,721
bksballer89
Most Popular Member
I see 15 possible losses. My guess is the Lakers win about half of those possible losses and lose either 7 or 8 more games to end the season
Reading is fundamental
I see 15 possible losses. My guess is the Lakers win about half of those possible losses and lose either 7 or 8 more games to end the season
You can't read? I said they have 15 possible losses (basically all the games against teams in playoffs contention) and said I think they lose 7 or 8 of those 15 games which was very clearly stated.
Just confirming we'll win 30 games since you were leading the parade we wouldn't before....
I'm sure at 10-28 you thought the Lakers would finish with close to 40 wins......
Please beat Detroit and the Clippers.Next 20 games for the Lakers:
Portland
Orlando
@Denver
Cleveland
Denver
@ Golden State
Miami
@Indiana
@New Orleans
@Memphis
@Detroit
Dallas
Milwaukee
Sacramento
@Utah
San Antonio
Minnesota
Utah
Houston
@LA Clippers
Just confirming we'll win 30 games since you were leading the parade we wouldn't before....
#Miamiwinningstreaklastseasonringabell?
Pretty sure he said 30 was possible after originally stating sub 30.
Just confirming we'll win 30 games since you were leading the parade we wouldn't before....
My range for them was between 29-34 wins.
Looks like they'll finish with a little more than 34 wins
Yeah that's another thing. The West got tougher. I mean I guess I can see low 30's if a lot of things go well. Like 33 or 34 but I think they're closer to 29-31
But that is a huge difference and literally the thing that allows you to play the 2 at the same time. Nance and Randle more difficult to play together.
July 5th.
Debunk'd...lol
A month ago he was saying they wouldn't hit 30.
It's a big difference, but it doesn't make them "almost nothing alike." I'm sure Nance and Randle not being able to play as well together is also part of why Nance was the one traded.
Worthy and McHale were great players. Don't think they were ever superstars though.
Their primes didn't overlap. J, Moses and Kareem had faded enough by the time the younger guys reached that status.
Also, not sure Nique was a superstar either. Again, really good scorer/player.
So yeah, I don't think there were as many superstars in any single year back then as there are today.
Oh, okay....A month ago he was saying they wouldn't hit 30.
A month ago? Link
I really don't think the lakers are winning 30 games
certainly not looking like it during this stretch...
seasons like this make me play more 2K...
I did say I thought they wouldn't win 30 games but that was TWO months ago when they were 11-27 and on a 9 game losing streak. Considering how poorly they were playing, going 19-25 over the final 44 didn't look like the easiest task.
Should also be noted that @ChiefsLakers67 was the only Lakers fan to respond and he just about agreed with me as I think most Lakers fan would have at that point. You were nowhere to be found as always...and in typical DJ fashion, you come back months later to try and rub something in a poster face when you had no comment on the original post. Same thing you did with my D-Wade comment as well as my Jimmy Butler comment.